Accessibility navigation

Extending the golden thread? Criminalisation and the presumption of innocence

Tomlin, P. (2013) Extending the golden thread? Criminalisation and the presumption of innocence. Journal of Political Philosophy, 21 (1). pp. 44-66. ISSN 1467-9760

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2011.00411.x


It seems to be widely accepted that the presumption of innocence, and the attendant standard of 'beyond reasonable doubt' properly apply in the courtroom as a procedural principle directly grounded in the moral imperative to avoid punishing those who should not be punished. In this article I argue that if this is correct, then we ought be as careful about what we criminalise, as we are about who we punish, since people can be wrongfully punished by criminalisation errors as well as by conviction errors.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Politics and International Relations
ID Code:26297

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation