Dairy farmers’ attitudes and intentions towards improving dairy cow foot health

Lists

Tools

Bruijnis, M., Hogeveen, H., Garforth, C. and Stassen, E. (2013) Dairy farmers’ attitudes and intentions towards improving dairy cow foot health. Livestock Science. ISSN 1871-1413

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2013.04.005

Abstract/Summary

Dairy cow foot health is a subject of concern because it is considered to be the most important welfare problem in dairy farming and causes economic losses for the farmer. In order to improve dairy cow foot health it is important to take into account the attitude and intention of dairy farmers. In our study the objective was to gain insight into the attitude and intention of dairy farmers to take action to improve dairy cow foot health and determine drivers and barriers to take action, using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Five hundred Dutch dairy farmers were selected randomly and were invited by email to fill in an online questionnaire. The questionnaire included questions about respondents’ intentions, attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control and was extended with questions about personal normative beliefs. With information from such a framework, solution strategies for the improvement of dairy cow foot health can be proposed. The results showed that almost 70% of the dairy farmers had an intention to take action to improve dairy cow foot health. Most important drivers seem to be the achievement of better foot health with cost-effective measures. Possible barriers to taking action were labor efficiency and a long interval between taking action and seeing an improvement in dairy cow foot health. The feed advisor and foot trimmer seemed to have most influence on intentions to take action to improve dairy cow foot health. Most farmers seemed to be satisfied with the foot health status at their farm, which probably weakens the intention for foot health improvement, especially compared to other issues which farmers experience as more urgent. Subclinical foot disorders (where cows are not visibly lame) were not valued as important with respect to animal welfare. Furthermore, 25% of the respondents did not believe cows could suffer pain. Animal welfare, especially the provision of good care for the cows, was valued as important but was not related to intention to improve dairy cow foot health. The cost-effectiveness of measures seemed to be more important. Providing more information on the effects of taking intervention measures might stimulate farmers to take action to achieve improvement in dairy cow foot health.

Item Type:	Article
Refereed:	Yes
Divisions:	Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Farm Management Unit Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of International Development
ID Code:	32187
Uncontrolled Keywords:	dairy cow foot health, dairy farmer, intention, Theory of Planned Behavior, animal welfare, economics
Publisher:	Elsevier

Altmetric

Related URLs

Deposit Details

References

Ajzen, I., 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. 50, 179-211. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632. Algers, B., Bertoni, G., Broom, D.M., Hartung, J., Lidfors, L., Metz, J.H.M., Munksgaard, L., Nunes Pina, T., Oltenacu, T., Rehage, J., Rushen, J., Smulders, F., Stassen, E.N., Stilwell, G., Waiblinger, S., Webster, J., 2009. Scientific Report on the Effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease. EFSA Journal. prepared by Animal Health and Animal Welfare Unit of the European Food Safety Authority, p. 284. Baarda, D.B., de Goede, M.P.M., van Dijkum, C.J., 2004. Introduction to Statistics with SPSS, A guide to the processing, analysing and reporting of (research) data. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen. Barbano, D.M., Ma, Y., Santos, M.V., 2006. Influence of raw milk quality on fluid milk shelf life. J. Dairy Sci. 89, E15-E19. Barker, Z.E., Leach, K.A., Whay, H.R., Bell, N.J., Main, D.C.J., 2010. Assessment of lameness prevalence and associated risk factors in dairy herds in England and Wales. J. Dairy Sci. 93, 932-941. Bell, N.J., 2005. Lameness: Evaluation, Hazards and Interventions. Cattle Pract. 13, 103-112. Bell, N.J., Bell, M.J., Knowles, T.G., Whay, H.R., Main, D.J., Webster, A.J.F., 2009. The development, implementation and testing of a lameness control programme based on HACCP principles and designed for heifers on dairy farms. Vet. J. 180, 178-188. Breugel van, V., Veerkamp, R., Kloosterman, P., Stassen, E.N., Visser, E., 2006. Nulmeting klauwengezondheid in kennis, houding en gedrag van melkveehouders. GD (English: Baseline studie foot health on knowledge, attitude and behaviour or dairy farmers, Animal Health Service). Bruijnis, M.R.N., Hogeveen, H., Stassen, E.N., 2010. Assessing economic consequences of foot disorders in dairy cattle using a dynamic stochastic simulation model. J. Dairy Sci. 93, 2419-2432. Bruijnis, M.R.N., Beerda, B., Hogeveen, H., Stassen, E.N., 2012. Assessing the welfare impact of foot disorders in dairy cattle by a modeling approach. Animal 6, 962-970. Bruijnis, M.R.N., Hogeveen, H., Stassen, E.N., 2013. Measures to improve dairy cow foot health: consequences for farmer income and dairy cow welfare. Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience 7, 167-175. CBS, 2008, http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/A19D9CB8-D4D7-44E4-88DE-02762B9E84CC/0/2008huisvestingvanlandbouwhuisdierenart.pdf, accessed on May 22 2012. CBS Statline, 2010, http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=70736ned&D1=0-5&D2=a&D3=4-6,l&VW=T, accessed on May 22 2012. Cook, N.B., Nordlund, K.V., 2009. The influence of the environment on dairy cow behavior, claw health and herd lameness dynamics. Vet. J. 179, 360-369. De Greef, K., Stafleu, F., De Lauwere, C., 2006. A Simple Value-Distinction Approach Aids Transparency in Farm Animal Welfare Debate. J. Agr. Environ. Ethic. 19, 57-66. Elliott, J., Sneddon, J., Lee, J.A., Blache, D., 2011. Producers have a positive attitude toward improving lamb survival rates but may be influenced by enterprise factors and perceptions of control. Livest. Sci. 140, 103-110. Ellis-Iversen, J., Cook, A.J.C., Watson, E., Nielen, M., Larkin, L., Wooldridge, M., Hogeveen, H., 2010. Perceptions, circumstances and motivators that influence implementation of zoonotic control programs on cattle farms. Prev. Vet. Med. 93, 276-285. Frankena, K., Somers, J.G.C.J., Schouten, W.G.P., van Stek, J.V., Metz, J.H.M., Stassen, E.N., Graat, E.A.M., 2009. The effect of digital lesions and floor type on locomotion score in Dutch dairy cows. Prev. Vet. Med. 88, 150-157. Fraser, D., Weary, D.M., Pajor, E.A., Milligan, B.N., 1997. A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Anim. Welfare 6, 187-205. Garforth, C.J., McKemey, K., Rehman, T., Tranter, R.B., Cooke, R.J., Park, J.R., Dorward, P.T., Yates, C.M., 2006. Farmers' attitudes towards techniques for improving oestrus detection in dairy herds in South West England. Livest. Sci. 103, 158-168. Huijps, K., Hogeveen, H., Lam, T.J.G.M., Huirne, R.B.M., 2009. Preferences of cost factors for mastitis management among Dutch dairy farmers using adaptive conjoint analysis. Prev. Vet. Med. 92, 351-359. Jansen, J., van den Borne, B.H.P., Renes, R.J., van Schaik, G., Lam, T.J.G.M., Leeuwis, C., 2009. Explaining mastitis incidence in Dutch dairy farming: The influence of farmers’ attitudes and behaviour. Prev. Vet. Med. 92, 210-223. Jansen, J., van Schaik, G., Renes, R.J., Lam, T.J.G.M., 2010. The effect of a national mastitis control program on the attitudes, knowledge, and behavior of farmers in the Netherlands. J. Dairy Sci. 93, 5737-5747. Kauppinen, T., Vesala, K.M., Valros, A., 2012. Farmer attitude toward improvement of animal welfare is correlated with piglet production parameters. Livest. Sci. 143, 142-150. Kielland, C., Skjerve, E., Østerås, O., Zanella, A.J., 2010. Dairy farmer attitudes and empathy toward animals are associated with animal welfare indicators. J. Dairy Sci. 93, 2998-3006. Lauwere, C.C., De Rooij, S., 2010. Dé ondernemer bestaat niet; Melkveehouders en varkenshouders over hun visie op dierenwelzijn en andere duurzaamheidsaspecten (English: The entrepreneur does not exist; dairy farmers and pig farmers about their vision on animal welfare and other sustainability aspects). Leach, K.A., Whay, H.R., Maggs, C.M., Barker, Z.E., Paul, E.S., Bell, A.K., Main, D.C.J., 2010. Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 1. Understanding barriers to lameness control on dairy farms. Res. Vet. Sci. 89, 311-317. LEI, 2009, http://www.lei.wur.nl/NL/statistieken/Land-+en+tuinbouwcijfers/, accessed on May 22 2012. LEI, 2011, http://www.lei.wur.nl/NL/statistieken/Land-+en+tuinbouwcijfers/, accessed on May 22 2012. Oliver, S.P., Jayarao, B.M., Almeida, R.A., 2005. Foodborne pathogens in milk and the dairy farm environment: Food safety and public health implications. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2, 115-129. Rehman, T., McKemey, K., Yates, C.M., Cooke, R.J., Garforth, C.J., Tranter, R.B., Park, J.R., Dorward, P.T., 2007. Identifying and understanding factors influencing the uptake of new technologies on dairy farms in SW England using the theory of reasoned action. Agr. Syst. 94, 281-293. Somers, J.G.C.J., Frankena, K., Noordhuizen-Stassen, E.N., Metz, J.H.M., 2003. Prevalence of Claw Disorders in Dutch Dairy Cows Exposed to Several Floor Systems. J. Dairy Sci. 86, 2082-2093. Te Velde, H., Aarts, N., Van Woerkum, C., 2002. Dealing with Ambivalence: Farmers' and Consumers' Perceptions of Animal Welfare in Livestock Breeding. J. Agr. Environ. Ethic. 15, 203-219. Valeeva, N.I., Lam, T.J.G.M., Hogeveen, H., 2007. Motivation of Dairy Farmers to Improve Mastitis Management. J. Dairy Sci. 90, 4466-4477. Wassink, G.J., George, T.R.N., Kaler, J., Green, L.E., 2010. Footrot and interdigital dermatitis in sheep: Farmer satisfaction with current management, their ideal management and sources used to adopt new strategies. Prev. Vet. Med. 96, 65-73. Whay, H.R., Main, D.C.J., Green, L.E., Webster, A.J.F., 2002. Farmer perception on lameness prevalence. In: Shearer, J.K. (Ed.), 12th International Symposium on Lameness in Ruminants, Orlando, Florida, pp. 355-358.

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

University of Reading

CentAUR: Central Archive at the University of Reading

Accessibility navigation

Dairy farmers’ attitudes and intentions towards improving dairy cow foot health

Abstract/Summary

Page navigation

See also

Footer navigation