Accessibility navigation

Dominance in the Tetra Pak case: an empirical approach

Garcia-Gallego, A. and Georgantzis, N. (1999) Dominance in the Tetra Pak case: an empirical approach. European Journal of Law and Economics, 7 (2). pp. 137-161. ISSN 0929-1261

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1023/A:1008657326185


The 1991 decision of the European Commission on the Tetra Pak case was based on information which seemed to prove the firm's anti-competitive behavior. The Tetra Pak case is investigated here focusing on the meaning of multimarket dominance, using empirical techniques. We find that a more rigorous analysis of the data available would not confirm the Commission's assertions. That is, it cannot be concluded with certainty that the Commission was right to relate Tetra Pak's dominance in the aseptic sector to its market power in the non-aseptic sector. Our results suggest a general framework for the analysis of abusive transfer of market power across vertically or/and horizontally related markets.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Agri-Food Economics & Marketing
ID Code:34796

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation