Accessibility navigation

Haircut undone? The Greek drama and prospects for investment arbitration

Glinavos, I. (2014) Haircut undone? The Greek drama and prospects for investment arbitration. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 5 (3). pp. 475-497. ISSN 2040-3585

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1093/jnlids/idu008


As a result of the sovereign debt crisis that engulfed Europe in 2010, investors are much more likely to pursue dispute resolution options when faced with losses. This paper seeks to examine the position of investors who suffered losses in the Greek haircut of 2012 in the context of investment treaty arbitration. The paper evaluates arguments that investments in Greek sovereign bonds have been expropriated by the introduction of retrofit CACs and that compensation is payable as a result of the protections offered by BITs. The paper investigates whether sovereign bonds come within the definition of protected investment in BITs, assesses the degree to which CACs act as a jurisdictional bar to investor-state claims and attempts an evaluation of whether claims could be successful. The analysis uses as an illustration recent cases brought against Greece at ICSID. The paper concludes by considering whether the Greek haircut was expropriatory and reflects on the possible outcome of current arbitrations.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
ID Code:36606
Uncontrolled Keywords:Sovereign Debt Crisis, CAC, Collective Action Clauses, Retrofit, Greece, Haircut, Investment Arbitration, BITs, Cyprus, Postova banka, ISTROKAPITAL, ICSID
Publisher:Oxford University Press

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation