Accessibility navigation

State practice, customary humanitarian law and civilian casualties of armed conflict

Breau, S. (2014) State practice, customary humanitarian law and civilian casualties of armed conflict. State Practice and International Law Journal, 1 (1). pp. 45-72.

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.


The article examines the customary international law credentials of the humanitarian law rules proposed by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICR) in 2005. It relies on the BIICL/Chatham House analysis as a ‘constructive comment’ on the methodology of the ICRC study and the rules formed as a result of that methodology with respect to the dead and missing as an aid to determination of their customary law status. It shows that most of the rules studied have a customary international lawpedigree which conforms to the conclusions formed on the rules generally in the Wilmshurst and Breau study. However, the rules with respect to return of personal effects, recording location of graves and notification of relatives of access to gravesites do not seem to have even on a majoritarian/deductive approach enough volume of state practice to establish them as customary with respect to civilians.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
ID Code:37416
Publisher:Sellier European Law Publishers

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation