Accessibility navigation


Why are some handaxes symmetrical? Testing the influence of handaxe morphology on butchery effectiveness

Machin, A. J., Hosfield, R. T. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6357-2805 and Mithen, S. J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3391-7443 (2007) Why are some handaxes symmetrical? Testing the influence of handaxe morphology on butchery effectiveness. Journal of Archaeological Science, 34 (6). pp. 883-893. ISSN 0305-4403

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2006.09.008

Abstract/Summary

The morphology of Acheulean handaxes continues to be a subject of debate amongst Lower Palaeolithic archaeologists, with some arguing that many handaxes are over-engineered for a subsistence function alone. This study aims to provide an empirical foundation for these debates by testing the relationship between a range of morphological variables, including symmetry, and the effectiveness of handaxes for butchery. Sixty handaxes were used to butcher 30 fallow deer by both a professional and a non-professional butcher. Regression analysis on the resultant data set indicates that while frontal symmetry may explain a small amount of variance in the effectiveness of handaxes for butchery, a large percentage of variance remains unexplained by symmetry or any of the other morphological variables under consideration.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Science > School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science > Department of Archaeology
Science > School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science > Scientific Archaeology
ID Code:3760
Uncontrolled Keywords:experimental archaeology handaxes butchery function symmetry STONE TOOLS ARCHAEOLOGY SELECTION
Additional Information:
Publisher:Elsevier

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation