Accessibility navigation


Workers with elderly dependants: employment law’s response to the latest care-giving conundrum

James, G. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1098-1506 and Spruce, E. (2015) Workers with elderly dependants: employment law’s response to the latest care-giving conundrum. Legal Studies: The Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars, 35 (3). pp. 463-479. ISSN 1748-121X

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

420kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1111/lest.12073

Abstract/Summary

This paper considers how employment laws are being used in response to what we have termed ‘the eldercare/workplace conundrum’. It is well known that people are now living longer but health is still failing in a significant percentage of older people, meaning that many adults require care for longer, albeit to varying degrees and for varying amounts of time. Many of these individuals will receive care from relatives or close friends who are participating in the labour market: this is increasingly likely as adults are expected / wanting to remain in paid work for longer, often into their 60s and 70s. The requirements of elderly dependants can cause these workers huge difficulties and dilemmas as they attempt, across time, to accommodate the particular needs of the person for whom they wish to provide care, often a loved one, and meet the particular demands of their employment relationship. In this paper we consider why this is an area of social policy that warrants effective legal engagement and consider, drawing on various examples of legal responses in other countries that face similar conundrums, what might improve legal engagement in this area.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
ID Code:37744
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation