# A comparison of duality and energy a posteriori estimates for $\mathrm {L}_{\infty }(0,T;\mathrm {L}_2(\varOmega ))$ in parabolic problems

Lakkis, O., Makridakis, C. and Pryer, T. (2015) A comparison of duality and energy a posteriori estimates for $\mathrm {L}_{\infty }(0,T;\mathrm {L}_2(\varOmega ))$ in parabolic problems. Mathematics of Computation, 84 (294). pp. 1537-1569. ISSN 0025-5718

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1090/S0025-5718-2014-02912-8

## Abstract/Summary

We use the elliptic reconstruction technique in combination with a duality approach to prove a posteriori error estimates for fully discrete backward Euler scheme for linear parabolic equations. As an application, we combine our result with the residual based estimators from the a posteriori estimation for elliptic problems to derive space-error indicators and thus a fully practical version of the estimators bounding the error in the $\mathrm {L}_{\infty }(0,T;\mathrm {L}_2(\varOmega ))$ norm. These estimators, which are of optimal order, extend those introduced by Eriksson and Johnson in 1991 by taking into account the error induced by the mesh changes and allowing for a more flexible use of the elliptic estimators. For comparison with previous results we derive also an energy-based a posteriori estimate for the $\mathrm {L}_{\infty }(0,T;\mathrm {L}_2(\varOmega ))$-error which simplifies a previous one given by Lakkis and Makridakis in 2006. We then compare both estimators (duality vs. energy) in practical situations and draw conclusions.

Item Type: Article Yes Faculty of Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Mathematics and Statistics 40921 American Mathematical Society

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record