Accessibility navigation

Construction contract policy: do we mean what we say?

Hughes, W. ORCID: and Maeda, Y. (2002) Construction contract policy: do we mean what we say? RICS Research Papers, 4 (12). pp. 1-25.

Text - Published Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.


It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.


Recent developments in contracting practice in the UK have built upon recommendations contained in highprofile reports, such as those by Latham and Egan. However, the New Engineering Contract (NEC), endorsed by Latham, is based upon principles of contract drafting that seem open to question. Any contract operates in the context of its legislative environment and current working practices. This report identifies eight contentious hypotheses in the literature on construction contracts and tests their validity in a sample survey that attracted 190 responses. The survey shows, among other things, that while partnership is a positive and useful idea, authoritative contract management is considered more effective and that “win-win” contracts, while desirable, are basically impractical. Further, precision and fairness in contracts are not easy to achieve simultaneously. While participants should know what is in their contracts, they should not routinely resort to legal action; and standard-form contracts should not seek to be universally applicable. Fundamental changes to drafting policy should be undertaken within the context of current legal contract doctrine and with a sensitivity to the way that contracts are used in contemporary practice. Attitudes to construction contracting may seem to be changing on the surface, but detailed analysis of what lies behind apparent agreement on new ways of working reveals that attitudes are changing much more slowly than they appear to be.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Science > School of the Built Environment > Organisation, People and Technology group
ID Code:4311
Uncontrolled Keywords:contract; procurement; drafting
Publisher:RICS Foundation


Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation