Casson, M.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2907-6538, Porter, L. and Wadeson, N.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8140-9307
(2016)
Internalization theory: an unfinished agenda.
International Business Review, 25 (6).
pp. 1223-1234.
ISSN 0969-5931
Preview |
Text (Formal mathematical model)
- Supplemental Material
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. · Please see our End User Agreement before downloading. 587kB |
It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.
To link to this item DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.03.007
Abstract/Summary
Internalization theory is usually applied at the firm level to analyse FDI, licensing and subcontracting, but this paper extends it to the industry level. It synthesises internalisation theory and oligopoly theory. It analyses a global industry where firms innovate competitively, and freely enter and exit the industry. It presents a formal model which highlights the inter-dependencies between rival firms. Each firm responds to its rivals by jointly optimising production and innovation through inter-dependent ownership and location decisions. The competitive outcome determines which firms serve which markets, which firms enter or exit the industry, and the internalisation strategy of each firm.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Refereed: | Yes |
| Divisions: | Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Economics |
| ID Code: | 61847 |
| Publisher: | Elsevier |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Lists
Lists