Accessibility navigation


Information or context: what accounts for positional proximity between the European Commission and lobbyists?

Bernhagen, P., Dür, A. and Marshall, D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6928-5708 (2015) Information or context: what accounts for positional proximity between the European Commission and lobbyists? Journal of European Public Policy, 22 (4). pp. 570-587. ISSN 1466-4429

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1008556

Abstract/Summary

Why are legislative proposals closer to the positions of some organized interests than others? The literature proposes that policy-makers are attentive to the demands of lobbyists that provide relevant information. At the same time, being part of a policy community is also claimed to enable lobbyists to shape policy formulation. We argue that both factors reinforce each other: informational resources are particularly effective in reducing the gap between the Commission's policy position and the position of lobbyists if both actors are part of the same policy community. Analysing data on over 100 policy issues in the European Union, we find that the context of a friendly Directorate-General reinforces the effectiveness of lobbyists’ informational resources. However, on its own, a context of friendly relations between the policy-maker and the lobbyist contrib­utes little to explaining why the European Commission's policy position is closer to some actors than to others.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Politics and International Relations
ID Code:70140
Publisher:Taylor & Francis

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation