Downloads

Anderson, G. (2015). What is knowledge in English and where does it come from? Changing English, 22 (1), 26-37. doi: 10.1080/1358684X.2014.992203. Ashby, R. (2017). Understanding historical evidence: teaching and learning challenges. In I. Davies (Ed.), Debates in history teaching (2nd edn.) (pp.144-154). London: Routledge. Barton, K. (2009). The denial of desire: how to make history education meaningless. In L. Symcox & A. Wilschut (Eds.), National history standards: The problem of the canon and the future of teaching history (pp.265-282). Charlotte, NC: Information Age. Beck, J. (2013). Powerful knowledge, esoteric knowledge, curriculum knowledge. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43 (2), 177-193. doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2013.767880. BERA (2011). Ethical guidelines for educational research. London: BERA. Biesta, G., Priestley, M. & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 21 (6), 624-640. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325 Boschman, F., McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2014). Understanding decision making in teachers’ curriculum design approaches. Education Technology Research Development, 62, 393-416. doi:10.1007/s11423-014-9341-x Burn, K. and Harris, R. (2011) Historical Association Survey of History in Schools in England 2011. London: Historical Association. Retrieved from: http://www.history.org.uk/resources/secondary_news_1290.html Cain, T., & Chapman, A. (2014). Dysfunctional dichotomies? Deflating bipolar constructions of curriculum and pedagogy through case studies from music and history. The Curriculum Journal, 25, 111–129. doi: 10.1080/09585176.2013.877396 Cannadine, D., Keating, J., & Sheldon, N. (2011). The right kind of history. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. Cercadillo, L. (2015). Teachers teaching history in Spain: Aims, perceptions, and practices on second order concepts. In A. Chapman & A. Wilschut (Eds.), Joined-up history (pp.115-136). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc. Dawson, I. (2008). Thinking across time: Planning and teaching the story of power and democracy at Key Stage 3. Teaching History, 130, 14-21. Retrieved from www.history.irg.uk DfE (2013a). The National Curriculum in England: Framework document for consultation. Retrieved from https://media.education.gov.uk/assets/files/pdf/n/national%20curriculum%20consultation%20-%20framework%20document.pdf DfE (2103b) History programmes of study: key stage 3 National Curriculum in England. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/239075/SECONDARY_national_curriculum_-_History.pdf. Accessed 01.04.15 Harris, R. (2012). ‘Purpose’ as a way of helping white trainee history teachers engage with diversity issues. Education Sciences, 2, 218-241. doi:10.3390/educsci2040218. Harris, R., & Burn, K. (2011). Curriculum theory, curriculum policy and the problem of ill-disciplined thinking. Journal of Education Policy, 26, 245–261. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2010.498902 Harris, R., & Burn, K. (2016) English history teachers’ views on what substantive content young people should be taught. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48 (4), 518-546. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2015.1122091 Harris, R. & Haydn, T. (2006). Pupils' enjoyment of history: what lessons can teachers learn from their pupils?. The Curriculum Journal, 17 (4), 315-333. doi: 10.1080/09585170601072544 Haydn, T., & Harris, R. (2010). Pupil perspectives on the purposes and benefits of studying history in high school: a view from the UK, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42 (2), 241-261. doi: 10.1080/00220270903403189 Hirsch, E.D. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. New York: Vintage Books. Howson, J., & Shemilt, D. (2011). Frameworks of knowledge: Dilemmas and debates. In I. Davies (Ed.), Debates in history teaching (pp.73–83). Abingdon: Routledge. Husbands, C., Kitson, A., & Pendry, A. (2003). Understanding history teaching: Teaching and learning about the past in secondary schools. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Lambert, D., & Biddulph, M. (2015). The dialogic space offered by curriculum-making in the process of learning to teach, and the creation of a progressive knowledge-led curriculum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43 (3), 210-224. doi: 10.1080/1359866X.2014.934197 Macaro, E. (2014). Grammar: The never-ending debate. In P. Driscoll, E. Macaro & A. Swarbrick (Eds.), Debates in modern language teaching (pp.108-120). London: Routledge. Mitchell, D., & Lambert, D. (2015). Subject knowledge and teacher preparation in English secondary schools: The case of geography. Teacher Development, 19 (3), 365-380. doi: 10.1080/13664530.2015.1042024 Monte-Sano, C., de la Paz, S., & Felton, M. (2014). Implementing a disciplinary-literacy curriculum for US history: Learning from expert middle school teachers in diverse classrooms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46 (4), 540-575. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2014.904444 Nakou, I., & Barca, I. (2010). Contemporary public debates over history education. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Nuttall, D. (2013). Possible futures: using frameworks of knowledge to help Year 9 connect past, present and future. Teaching History, 151, 33-44. Retrieved from www.history.org.uk Ormond, B.M. (2016). Curriculum decisions – the challenges of teacher autonomy over knowledge selection for history. Journal of Curriculum Studies, in press. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2016.1149225 QCA (2007). History: programme of study for key stage 3 and attainment target. London: QCA. Riley, M. (1997). Big stories and big pictures: Making outlines and overviews interesting. Teaching History, 88, 20-22. Retrieved from www.history.org.uk Robson, C. (2002) Real world research. (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Press. Sandwell, R. (2012). ‘We were allowed to disagree, because we couldn’t agree on anything’: Seventeen voices in Canadian debates over history education. In T. Taylor & R. Guyver (Eds.) History wars and the classroom: Global perspectives. Charlotte, NC: Information Age. Sears, A. (2017). Trends and issues in history education in international contexts. In I. Davies (Ed.), Debates in history teaching (2nd edn.) (pp. 42-52). London: Routledge. Seixas, P. (2007). Who needs a canon? In M. Grever & S. Stuurman (Eds.) Beyond the canon: History for the twenty-first century (pp.19-30). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Shemilt, D. (2009). Drinking an ocean and pissing a cupful: How adolescents make sense of history. In L. Symcox & A. Wilschut (Eds.), National history standards: The problem of the canon and the future of teaching history (pp.141–210). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc. Swalwell, K., Pellegrino, A.M., & View, J.L. (2015). Teachers’ curricula choices when teaching histories of oppressed people: Capturing the US Civil Rights Movement. Journal of Social Studies Research, 39, 79-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jssr.2014.11.003 Van Straaten, D., Wilschut, A.,& Oostdam, R. (2016). Making history relevant to students by connecting past, present and future: A framework for research. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48 (4), 479-502. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2015.1089938 Young, M. (2011). The return to subjects: A sociological perspective on the UK Coalition government’s approach to the 14–19 curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 22, 265–278. doi: 10.1080/09585176.2011.574994 Young, M. (2013). Powerful knowledge: an analytically useful concept or just a ‘sexy sounding term’? A response to John Beck’s ‘Powerful knowledge, esoteric knowledge, curriculum knowledge’. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43 (2), 195-198. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2013.776356. Young, M. (2014). What is a curriculum and what can it do? The Curriculum Journal, 25 (1), 7-13. doi: 10.1080/09585176.2014.902526 Young, M., & Muller, J. (2010). Three educational scenarios for the future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Education, 45, 11–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01413.x