Abstract/Summary

This paper reflects on The Geographical Tradition through the lens of feminist and other critical historiographies of geography, linking therein to recent discussion on the relative merits of canonical status and the dilemmas and legacies of wide‐ranging, selective, and partial histories. It argues for inclusive, more‐than‐contextual historiographies, and reflects on what these mean epistemologically, methodologically, and in terms of the contemporary experience of the discipline.