Accessibility navigation

Particle removal efficiency of a household portable air cleaner in real-world residences: A single-blind cross-over field study

Cai, J., Yu, W., Li, B., Yao, R., Zhang, T., Guo, M., Wang, H., Zheng, Z., Xiong, J., Meng, Q. and Kipen, H. (2019) Particle removal efficiency of a household portable air cleaner in real-world residences: A single-blind cross-over field study. Energy and Buildings, 203. 109464. ISSN 0378-7788

Text - Accepted Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.


It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109464


Portable air cleaners are commonly used to reduce indoor air particles in China, but few studies have evaluated the treatment efficiency under real living conditions. We aimed to evaluate the efficiency of a portable air cleaner in common residences under normal living conditions. A single-blind cross-over field study was conducted in 20 urban residences in Chongqing, China. In each residence, one portable air cleaner was operated without a high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter (sham filtration) for the first 48 h and with a HEPA filter (true filtration) for the next 48 h in the living room. Concentrations of PM1.0, PM2.5, respirable suspended particulate matter (RESP), PM10, and total suspended particulate matter (TSP) were measured simultaneously in indoor and ambient outdoor air. Compared to sham filtration, the average concentrations of indoor air particles were significantly lower when true filtration was used according to paired-sample t-tests (all p-values <0.05). However, indoor concentrations of PM2.5 in 16 (80%) residences were still higher than the World Health Organization’s (WHO) air quality guideline during true filtration. The removal efficiencies of the portable air cleaners with HEPA filters for these particles were about 40%. The removal efficiencies for PM1.0, PM2.5, and RESP had significant associations with the room volume, but not with the residence district, season, age of the building, floor level of the apartment, or ambient weather. Our results indicate that a portable air cleaner is effective in improving household air quality, but is not enough to ensure the air quality meeting WHO guideline in all real-world residences in polluted areas.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Science > School of the Built Environment > Energy and Environmental Engineering group
ID Code:86707


Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation