Accessibility navigation

The case for feminist legal history

Rackley, E. and Auchmuty, R. (2020) The case for feminist legal history. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 40 (4). pp. 878-904. ISSN 0143-6503

Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.


It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqaa023


While we may be witnessing a highpoint of interest in the lives of early women lawyers, and women’s legal history generally, feminist legal history remains largely undeveloped in the UK. Drawing on examples of women’s representation in and engagement with law and law reform in the UK and Ireland, this article delineates the method, scope and purpose of feminist legal history. It begins by exploring the place of women in traditional accounts of legal history, before going on to consider the methodological and substantive goals of feminist legal history. We argue that feminist legal history is a political project, requiring its authors to commit not only to uncovering untold stories but to challenging and revising dominant historical narratives. We conclude with a call for scholars to take up the insights and methods of feminist legal history as a means of acknowledging and celebrating the agency of those involved in past and ongoing struggles for justice and equality.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
ID Code:91210
Publisher:Oxford University Press


Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation