It’s just not cricket: rules and the gentleman’s game

Lists

Tools

Reade, J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8610-530X, Singleton, C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8247-8830 and Jewell, S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4413-6618 (2021) It’s just not cricket: rules and the gentleman’s game. In: Butler, R. (ed.) Advances in Sports Economics. Agenda Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. ISBN 9781788213554

Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
977kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Official URL: https://www.agendapub.com/books/125/advances-in-sp...

Abstract/Summary

Cricket offers a wealth of opportunity and potential insights for economists and other researchers. Focusing on the oldest domestic cricket competition, the English County Championship, we discuss issues of demand, home advantage, competitive balance and the importance of winning the pre-match coin toss to determine the playing order. Despite cricket being generally regarded as a sport for traditionalists, the County Championship is remarkable in how often the rule makers have altered its format. We study one recent major change, the replacement of the mandatory pre-match coin toss with an uncontested one, whereby the away team could decide whether to bowl first or face a toss to bat instead. In theory, this ought to have reduced home advantage, made the toss matter more when it was contested, and incentivised teams to prepare better pitches leading to longer matches. We found no evidence of the first or the last of these effects, but matches did become more predictable once the toss was decided. This suggests that the rule makers were right to abandon this experimental change after only four seasons.

Item Type:	Book or Report Section
Refereed:	Yes
Divisions:	Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Politics, Economics and International Relations > Economics
ID Code:	91647
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Home advantage, First-mover advantage, Decision making under uncertainty, Coin toss, County Championship, First-class cricket
Publisher:	Agenda Publishing

Altmetric

Deposit Details

References

• Allsopp, P., and S. Clarke. 2004. “Rating teams and analysing outcomes in one-day and test cricket.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 167(4): 657–667. • Bhaskar, V. 2009. “Rational Adversaries? Evidence from Randomised Trials in One Day Cricket.” The Economic Journal, 119(534): 1–23. • Bhattacharya, M., and R. Smyth. 2003. “The Game is Not the Same: The Demand for Test Match Cricket in Australia.” Australian Economic Papers, 42(1): 77–90. • Blackham, J., and B. Chapman. 2004. “The value of Don Bradman: Additional revenue in Australian Ashes tests.” Economic Papers: A journal of applied economics and policy, 23(4): 369–385. • Borland, J., and R. MacDonald. 2003. “Demand for Sport.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(4): 478–502. • Borooah, V. K. 2016. “Upstairs and Downstairs: The Imperfections of Cricket’s Decision Review System.” Journal of Sports Economics, 17(1): 64–85. • Cairns, J., Jennett, N. and Sloane, P. 1986, “The Economics of Professional Team Sports: A Survey of Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Economic Studies, 13(1), 3-80. • Chamberlain, G. 1980. “Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data.” Review of Economic Studies, 47(1): 225–238. • Clarke, S. R., and P. Allsopp. 2001. “Fair measures of performance: the World Cup of cricket.” Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52(4): 471–479. • Crowe, S. M., and J. Middeldorp. 1996. “A Comparison of Leg Before Wicket Rates Between Australians and Their Visiting Teams for Test Cricket Series Played in Australia, 1977-94.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D (The Statistician), 45(2): 255–262. • Dawson, P., B. Morley, D. Paton, and D. Thomas. 2009. “To bat or not to bat: An examination of match outcomes in day-night limited overs cricket.” Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(12): 1786–1793. • De Silva, B. M., and T. B. Swartz. 1998. “Winning the Coin Toss and the Home Team Advantage in One-Day International Cricket Matches.” The New Zealand Statistician, 32(1): 16–22. • Dohmen, T., and J. Sauermann. 2016. “Referee Bias.” Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(4): 679–695. • Elo, A. E. 1978. The Rating of Chessplayers, Past and Present. London: Batsford. • Forrest, D., and R. Dorsey. 2008. “Effect of toss and weather on County Cricket Championship outcomes.” Journal of Sports Sciences, 26(1): 3–13. • Gregory-Smith, I., D. Paton, and A. Sacheti. 2019. “The Economics of Cricket.” in The SAGE Handbook of Sports Economics, Paul Downward, Bernd Frick, Brad R. Humphreys, Tim Pawlowski, Jane E. Ruseski, Brian P. Soebbing (eds.) • Hvattum, L. M., and H. Arntzen. 2010. “Using ELO ratings for match result prediction in association football.” International Journal of Forecasting, 26(3): 460–470. • Hynds, M., and I. Smith. 1994. “The Demand for Test Match Cricket.” Applied Economics Letters, 1(7): 103–106. • Jewell, S. and J.J. Reade. 2014. “On Fixing International Cricket Matches.” Economics & Management Discussion Papers, em-dp2014-08, Henley Business School, Reading University. • Lenten, L. J., and Winchester, N. (2015). “Secondary Behavioural Incentives: Bonus Points and Rugby Professionals.” Economic Record, 91(294): 386-398. • Morley, B., and D. Thomas. 2005. “An investigation of home advantage and other factors affecting outcomes in English one-day cricket matches.” Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(3): 261–268. • Morley, B., and D. Thomas. 2007. “Attendance demand and core support: evidence from limited-overs cricket.” Applied Economics, 39(16): 2085–2097. • Papps, K. L., and A. Bryson. 2019. “Spillovers and Substitutability in Production.” IZA Discussion Papers 12252, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA). • Paton, D., and A. Cooke. 2005. “Attendance at County Cricket: An Economic Analysis.” Journal of Sports Economics, 6(1): 24–45. • Peeters, T., and van Ours, J. C. 2020. “Seasonal Home Advantage in English Professional Football; 1973-2018,” Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 20-025/V, Tinbergen Institute. • Reade, J.J. 2019, “Officials and Home Advantage”, in The SAGE Handbook of Sports Economics, Paul Downward, Bernd Frick, Brad R. Humphreys, Tim Pawlowski, Jane E. Ruseski, Brian P. Soebbing (eds.) • Reade, J.J. 2020. “Football Attendance Over the Centuries.” Economics & Management Discussion Papers em-dp2020-08, Henley Business School, Reading University. • Reade, J.J., C. Singleton, and A. Brown. 2019. “Evaluating Strange Forecasts: The Curious Case of Football Match Scorelines.” Economics & Management Discussion Papers em-dp2019-18, Henley Business School, Reading University. • Ringrose, T. 2006. “Neutral umpires and leg before wicket decisions in test cricket.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 169(4): 903–911. • Rottenberg, S. 1956. “The Baseball Players’ Labor Market.” Journal of Political Economy, 64(3): 242–258. • Sacheti, A., I. Gregory-Smith, and D. Paton. 2014. “Uncertainty of Outcome or Strengths of Teams: An Economic Analysis of Attendance Demand for International Cricket.” Applied Economics, 46(17): 2034–2046. • Sacheti, A., I. Gregory-Smith, and D. Paton. 2015. “Home bias in officiating: evidence from international cricket.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 178(3): 741–755. • Sacheti, A., D. Paton, and I. Gregory-Smith. 2016a. “An Economic Analysis of Attendance Demand for One Day International Cricket.” Economic Record, 92(296): 121–136. • Sacheti, A., I. Gregory-Smith, and D. Paton. 2016b. “Managerial Decision Making Under Uncertainty: The Case of Twenty20 Cricket.” Journal of Sports Economics, 17(1): 44–63. • Schofield, J. 1983. “The Demand for Cricket: The Case of the John Player League.” Applied Economics, 15(3): 283–296. • Schofield, J. 1988. “Production functions in the sports industry: an empirical analysis of professional cricket.” Applied Economics, 20(2): 177–193. • Shivakumar, R. 2018. “What Technology Says About Decision-Making: Evidence From Cricket’s Decision Review System (DRS).” Journal of Sports Economics, 19(3): 315–331. • Singleton, C., J. J. Reade, and A. Brown. 2019. “Going with your gut: The (In)accuracy of forecast revisions in a football score prediction game.” Journal of Bahavioral and Experimental Economics, Forthcoming. • Szymanski, S. 2003. “The Economic Design of Sporting Contests.” Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4): 1137–1187.

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

University of Reading

CentAUR: Central Archive at the University of Reading

Accessibility navigation

It’s just not cricket: rules and the gentleman’s game

Abstract/Summary

Page navigation

See also

Footer navigation