Accessibility navigation

Cats about town: is predation by free-ranging pet cats Felis catus likely to affect urban bird populations?

Baker, P. J., Molony, S. E., Stone, E., Cuthill, I. C. and Harris, S. (2008) Cats about town: is predation by free-ranging pet cats Felis catus likely to affect urban bird populations? Ibis, 150. pp. 86-99. ISSN 0019-1019

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00836.x


Even though they are fed daily by their owners, free-ranging pet cats Felis catus may kill wild birds and, given their high densities (typically > 200 cats/km(2)), it has been postulated that cat predation could be a significant negative factor affecting the dynamics of urban bird populations. In this study, we: (1) used questionnaire surveys in 10 sites within the city of Bristol, UK, to estimate cat density; (2) estimated the number of birds killed annually in five sites by asking cat owners to record prey animals returned home; and then (3) compared the number of birds killed with breeding density and productivity to estimate the potential impact of cat predation. In addition, we (4) compared the condition of those birds killed by cats versus those killed in collisions, e.g. window strikes. Mean (+/- sd) cat density was 348 +/- 86 cats/km(2) (n = 10 sites); considering the eight species most commonly taken by cats, the mean ratios of adult birds/cats and juvenile birds/cats across the five sites were 1.17 +/- 0.23 and 3.07 +/- 0.74, respectively. Approximately 60% of the cats studied for up to 1 year at each site never returned any prey home; despite this, the estimated number of birds killed was large relative to their breeding density and productivity in many sites. Across species, cat-killed birds were in significantly poorer condition than those killed following collisions; this is consistent with the notion that cat predation represents a compensatory rather than additive form of mortality. Interpretation of these results is, however, complicated by patterns of body mass regulation in passerines. The predation rates estimated in this study would suggest that cats were likely to have been a major cause of mortality for some species of birds. The effect of cat predation in urban landscapes therefore warrants further investigation. The potential limitations of the current study are discussed, along with suggestions for resolving them.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Life Sciences > School of Biological Sciences
ID Code:9739
Uncontrolled Keywords:fluctuating asymmetry, garden birds, hyperpredation, introduced, species, urban biodiversity, FREE-ROAMING CATS, TIT PARUS-MAJOR, DOMESTIC CATS, FLUCTUATING, ASYMMETRY, HOUSE CATS, GREAT TIT, FOX CONTROL, FERAL CATS, WILDLIFE, AUSTRALIA

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation