Accessibility navigation


A comparison among four different retrieval methods for ice-cloud properties using data from CloudSat, CALIPSO, and MODIS

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Stein, T. H. M., Delanoë, J. and Hogan, R. J. (2011) A comparison among four different retrieval methods for ice-cloud properties using data from CloudSat, CALIPSO, and MODIS. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 50 (9). pp. 1952-1969. ISSN 1558-8432

[img] Text - Published Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

2342Kb

To link to this article DOI: 10.1175/2011JAMC2646.1

Abstract/Summary

The A-Train constellation of satellites provides a new capability to measure vertical cloud profiles that leads to more detailed information on ice-cloud microphysical properties than has been possible up to now. A variational radar–lidar ice-cloud retrieval algorithm (VarCloud) takes advantage of the complementary nature of the CloudSat radar and Cloud–Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) lidar to provide a seamless retrieval of ice water content, effective radius, and extinction coefficient from the thinnest cirrus (seen only by the lidar) to the thickest ice cloud (penetrated only by the radar). In this paper, several versions of the VarCloud retrieval are compared with the CloudSat standard ice-only retrieval of ice water content, two empirical formulas that derive ice water content from radar reflectivity and temperature, and retrievals of vertically integrated properties from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) radiometer. The retrieved variables typically agree to within a factor of 2, on average, and most of the differences can be explained by the different microphysical assumptions. For example, the ice water content comparison illustrates the sensitivity of the retrievals to assumed ice particle shape. If ice particles are modeled as oblate spheroids rather than spheres for radar scattering then the retrieved ice water content is reduced by on average 50% in clouds with a reflectivity factor larger than 0 dBZ. VarCloud retrieves optical depths that are on average a factor-of-2 lower than those from MODIS, which can be explained by the different assumptions on particle mass and area; if VarCloud mimics the MODIS assumptions then better agreement is found in effective radius and optical depth is overestimated. MODIS predicts the mean vertically integrated ice water content to be around a factor-of-3 lower than that from VarCloud for the same retrievals, however, because the MODIS algorithm assumes that its retrieved effective radius (which is mostly representative of cloud top) is constant throughout the depth of the cloud. These comparisons highlight the need to refine microphysical assumptions in all retrieval algorithms and also for future studies to compare not only the mean values but also the full probability density function.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Faculty of Science > School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences > Department of Meteorology
ID Code:24143
Uncontrolled Keywords:Remote sensing, Satellite observations, Cloud microphysics, Lidars/lidar observations
Publisher:American Meteorological Society

Download Statistics for this item.

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation