Accessibility navigation


The adoption of the materiality concept in social and environmental reporting assurance: a field study approach

Edgley, C. R., Jones, M. J. and Atkins, J. (2015) The adoption of the materiality concept in social and environmental reporting assurance: a field study approach. The British Accounting Review, 47 (1). pp. 1-18. ISSN 0890-8389

[img] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only

197kB
[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

360kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2014.11.001

Abstract/Summary

This study investigates the logics or values that shape the social and environmental reporting (SER) and SER assurance (SERA) process. The influence of logics is observed through a study of the conceptualisation and operationalisation of the materiality concept by accounting and non-accounting assurors and their assurance statements. We gathered qualitative data from interviews with both accounting and non-accounting assurors. We analysed the interplay between old and new logics that are shaping materiality as a reporting concept in SER. SER is a rich field in which to study the dynamics of change because it is a voluntary, unregulated, qualitative reporting arena. It has a broad, stakeholder audience, where accounting and non-accounting organisations are in competition. There are three key findings. First, the introduction of a new, stakeholder logic has significantly changed the meaning and role of materiality. Second, a more versatile, performative, social understanding of materiality was portrayed by assurors, with a forward-looking rather than a historic focus. Third, competing logics have encouraged different beliefs about materiality, and practices, to develop. This influenced the way assurors theorised the concept and interpreted outcomes. A patchwork of localised understandings of materiality is developing. Policy implications both in SERA and also in financial audit are explored.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Henley Business School > Business Informatics, Systems and Accounting
ID Code:38970
Uncontrolled Keywords:Institutional logics; Materiality; Social and Environmental Reporting Assurance (SERA)
Publisher:Elsevier

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation