Accessibility navigation


Working group 3: What are and how do we measure the pros and cons of existing approaches?

Reynolds, C., Leutbecher, M., Batte, L., Chen, S., Christensen, H., Klasa, C., Pegion, P., Plant, B., Raynaud, L., Roberts, N., Sandu, I., Singleton, A., Sommer, M., Swinbank, R., Tennant, W. and Theis, S. (2016) Working group 3: What are and how do we measure the pros and cons of existing approaches? In: ECMWF/WWRP Workshop: Model Uncertainty, 11-15 April 2016, ECMWF, Reading, pp. 13-16.

[img]
Preview
Text (Open access) - Accepted Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

208kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Official URL: http://www.ecmwf.int/en/elibrary/16551-ecmwf-wwrp-...

Abstract/Summary

WG3 discussed both the pros and cons of existing schemes as well as metrics to measure relative advantages and disadvantages. We first provide a list of the current operational techniques and their respective advantages and disadvantages that were discussed in the WG. We do not claim that the list is complete, and we note that the pros and cons are neither exhaustive nor quantitative. Nevertheless, it may be useful to note the WG’s consensus on the general advantages and disadvantages of the most commonly-used schemes. We then list our recommendations for evaluating model uncertainty schemes. At the end is a short list pertaining to recommendations for further development of methods to represent model uncertainty.

Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Faculty of Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
ID Code:66610

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation