Accessibility navigation


Aerosol and physical atmosphere model parameters are both important sources of uncertainty in aerosol ERF

Regayre, L., Johnson, J., Yoshioka, M., Pringle, K., Sexton, D., Booth, B., Lee, L., Bellouin, N. and Carslaw, K. (2018) Aerosol and physical atmosphere model parameters are both important sources of uncertainty in aerosol ERF. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 18 (13). pp. 9975-10006. ISSN 1680-7316

[img]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

2MB
[img] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only

2MB

To link to this item DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-9975-2018

Abstract/Summary

Changes in aerosols cause a change in net top-of-the-atmosphere (ToA) short-wave and long-wave radiative fluxes, rapid adjustments in clouds, water vapour and temperature, and cause an effective radiative forcing (ERF) of the planetary energy budget. The diverse sources of model uncertainty and the computational cost of running climate models make it difficult to isolate the main causes of aerosol ERF uncertainty and to understand how observations can be used to constrain it. We explore the aerosol ERF uncertainty by using fast model emulators to generate a very large set of aerosol-climate model variants that span the model uncertainty due to twenty-seven parameters related to atmospheric and aerosol processes. Sensitivity analyses shows that the uncertainty in the ToA flux is dominated (around 80 %) by uncertainties in the physical atmosphere model, particularly parameters that affect cloud reflectivity. However, uncertainty in the change in ToA flux caused by aerosol emissions over the industrial period (the aerosol ERF) is controlled by a combination of uncertainties in aerosol (around 60 %) and physical atmosphere (around 40 %) parameters. Four of the atmospheric and aerosol parameters that cause uncertainty in short-wave ToA flux (mostly parameters that directly scale cloud reflectivity, cloud water content or cloud droplet concentrations) also account for around 60% of the aerosol ERF uncertainty. The common causes of uncertainty mean that constraining the modelled planetary brightness to tightly match satellite observations changes the lower 95 % credible aerosol ERF value from −2.65 Wm−2 to −2.37 Wm−2. This suggests the strongest forcings (below around −2.4 Wm−2) are inconsistent with observations. These results show that, regardless of the fact that the ToA flux is an order of magnitude larger than the aerosol ERF, the observed flux can constrain the uncertainty in ERF because their values are connected by constrainable process parameters. The key to reducing the aerosol ERF uncertainty further will be to identify observations that can additionally constrain individual parameter ranges and/or combined parameter effects, which can be achieved through sensitivity analysis of perturbed parameter ensembles.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Faculty of Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
ID Code:77776
Publisher:Copernicus Publications

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation