Accessibility navigation


The effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions delivered by community pharmacists: randomized controlled trial

Dhital, R., Norman, I., Whittlesea, C., Murrells, T. and McCambridge, J. (2015) The effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions delivered by community pharmacists: randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 110 (10). pp. 1586-1594. ISSN 0965-2140

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

1MB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1111/add.12994

Abstract/Summary

Background and Aims To undertake the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a brief intervention delivered by community pharmacists to reduce hazardous or harmful drinking. Design This parallel group randomized trial allocated participants individually to brief alcohol intervention (n=205) or a leaflet-only control condition (n=202), with follow-up study after 3 months. Setting Sixteen community pharmacies in one London Borough, UK. Participants A total of 407 pharmacy customers (aged 18 years or over) with Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) scores 8–19, inclusive. Intervention A brief motivational discussion of approximately 10 minutes’ duration, for which 17 pharmacists received a half-day of training. Measurements Hazardous or harmful drinking was assessed using the AUDIT administered by telephone by a researcher blind to allocation status. The two primary outcomes were: (1) change in AUDIT total scores and (2) the proportions no longer hazardous or harmful drinkers (scoring <8) at 3months. The four secondary outcomes were: the three subscale scores of the AUDIT (for consumption, problems and dependence) and health status according to the EQ-5D (a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome). Findings At 3 months 326 (80% overall; 82% intervention, 78% control) participants were followed-up. The difference in reduction in total AUDIT score (intervention minus control) was –0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI)=–1.59 to 0.45, P=0.28. The odds ratio for AUDIT ˂ 8 (control as reference) was 0.87, 95% CI=0.50 to 1.51, P=0.61). For two of the four secondary outcomes (dependence score: –0.46, 95% CI=–0.82 to –0.09, P=0.014; health status score: –0.09, 95% CI=–0.16 to –0.02, P=0.013) the control group did better, and in the other two there were no differences (consumption score: –0.05, 95% CI=–0.54 to 0.44, P=0.85; non-dependence problems score: –0.13, 95% CI=–0.66 to 0.41). Sensitivity analyses did not change these findings. Conclusions A brief intervention delivered by community pharmacists appears to have had no effect in reducing hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Faculty of Life Sciences > School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy > School of Pharmacy > Pharmacy Practice Research Group
ID Code:80760
Uncontrolled Keywords:Alcohol, brief intervention, community pharmacist, community pharmacy, hazardous and harmful drinking.
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation