Accessibility navigation


Narrowing the international law divide: the drone debate matures

Schmitt, M. N. (2014) Narrowing the international law divide: the drone debate matures. Yale Journal of International Law Online, 39. pp. 1-14.

[img] Text - Published Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

213kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Official URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_i...

Abstract/Summary

This article examines four reports on drone operations released in October 2013: 1) The Heyns UN Special Rapporteur report; 2) the Emmerson UN Special Rapporteur report; 3) the Human Rights Watch report; and 4) the Amnesty International report. It concludes that although the author does not necessarily agree with all conclusions reached in the four reports, they nevertheless represent a sea change in the nature of reports and commentary on drone operations. In particular, the four reports adopt the traditional approach to analyzing attacks under international law, including international humanitarian law and human rights law.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
ID Code:89842
Publisher:Yale University

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation