Accessibility navigation


Forecaster efficiency, accuracy and disagreement: evidence using individual-level survey data

Clements, M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-1341 (2020) Forecaster efficiency, accuracy and disagreement: evidence using individual-level survey data. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. ISSN 1538-4616 (In Press)

[img] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

245kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Abstract/Summary

Theories of expectations formation sometimes suppose that agents make efficient forecasts given their information sets. We use individual-level data to test whether survey respondents forecasts are efficient. We assess whether there are systematic differences between forecasters in terms of their degrees of contrarianism, and the accuracy of their forecasts, and whether these are explicable by inefficiencies in the use of information. We find that forecaster inefficiency cannot explain persistence in levels of disagreement across forecasters, but there is evidence that the inefficient use of information is responsible for persistent differences in accuracy across forecasters.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Henley Business School > ICMA Centre
ID Code:93811
Publisher:Wiley

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation