Accessibility navigation


Productivity, biodiversity trade-offs, and farm income in an agroforestry versus an arable system

Staton, T., Breeze, T. D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8929-8354, Walters, R. J., Smith, J. and Girling, R. D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8816-8075 (2022) Productivity, biodiversity trade-offs, and farm income in an agroforestry versus an arable system. Ecological Economics, 191. 107214. ISSN 0921-8009

[img] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only until 11 September 2022.
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

395kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107214

Abstract/Summary

The uptake of diversified farming systems is constrained by a scarcity of evidence regarding financial costs, benefits, and risks. Here, we evaluate the productivity and projected farm income of an agroforestry system, where apples are integrated with arable crops, by combining primary data with ecosystem service and cost-benefit models. Our ecosystem service assessments included: 1) weed and pest associations with arable yields; 2) apple seed set as a proxy for pollination, and; 3) carbon sequestration. Arable yields were up to 11% lower in agroforestry than arable systems, and were significantly negatively associated with weed cover in both systems. Apple yields in agroforestry were similar to typical yields from comparable orchards. Apple seed set was significantly higher in agroforestry than conventional orchards for one of two varieties. Predicted gross mixed income was higher in agroforestry than arable systems in 15 of 18 productivity scenarios over 20 years, which was supported by a case-study. Apple yield and price were the major determinants of gross mixed income. Payments for carbon sequestration were predicted to contribute 47% to 88% of agroforestry establishment costs. This study demonstrates how a diversified farming system can improve farm income, but grant support would reduce the initial negative cash-flow.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Biodiversity, Crops and Agroecosystems Division > Centre for Agri-environmental Research (CAER)
ID Code:100022
Publisher:Elsevier

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation