Accessibility navigation

Representative estimates of COVID-19 infection fatality rates from four locations in India: cross-sectional study

Cai, R., Novosad, P., Tandel, V., Asher, S. and Malani, A. (2021) Representative estimates of COVID-19 infection fatality rates from four locations in India: cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 11 (10). e050920. ISSN 2044-6055

Text (Open access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.


It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050920


Objectives: To estimate age-specific and sex-specific mortality risk among all SARS-CoV-2 infections in four settings in India, a major lower-middle-income country and to compare age trends in mortality with similar estimates in high-income countries. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: India, multiple regions representing combined population >150 million. Participants: Aggregate infection counts were drawn from four large population-representative prevalence/ seroprevalence surveys. Data on corresponding number of deaths were drawn from official government reports of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 deaths. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome was age-specific and sex-specific infection fatality rate (IFR), estimated as the number of confirmed deaths per infection. The secondary outcome was the slope of the IFR-by-age function, representing increased risk associated with age. Results: Among males aged 50–89, measured IFR was 0.12% in Karnataka (95% CI 0.09% to 0.15%), 0.42% in Tamil Nadu (95% CI 0.39% to 0.45%), 0.53% in Mumbai (95% CI 0.52% to 0.54%) and an imprecise 5.64% (95% CI 0% to 11.16%) among migrants returning to Bihar. Estimated IFR was approximately twice as high for males as for females, heterogeneous across contexts and rose less dramatically at older ages compared with similar studies in high-income countries. Conclusions: Estimated age-specific IFRs during the first wave varied substantially across India. While estimated IFRs in Mumbai, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu were considerably lower than comparable estimates from high-income countries, adjustment for under-reporting based on crude estimates of excess mortality puts them almost exactly equal with higher-income country benchmarks. In a marginalised migrant population, estimated IFRs were much higher than in other contexts around the world. Estimated IFRs suggest that the elderly in India are at an advantage relative to peers in high-income countries. Our findings suggest that the standard estimation approach may substantially underestimate IFR in low-income settings due to under-reporting of COVID-19 deaths, and that COVID-19 IFRs may be similar in low-income and high-income settings.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Henley Business School > Real Estate and Planning
ID Code:100981
Publisher:BMJ Group


Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation