Bridging the research-implementation gap in IUCN Red List assessmentsCazalis, V., di Marco, M., Butchart, S. H. M., Akçakaya, H. R., Gonzalez-Suarez, M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5069-8900, Meyer, C., Clausnitzer, V., Bohm, M., Zizka, A., Cardoso, P., Schipper, A. M., Bachman, S. P., Young, B. E., Hoffman, M., Benitez-Lopez, A., Lucas, P. M., Pettorelli, N., Patoine, G., Pacifici, M., Jorger-Hickfang, T. , Brooks, T. M., Rondinini, C., Hill, S. L. L., Visconti, P. and Santini, L. (2022) Bridging the research-implementation gap in IUCN Red List assessments. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 37 (4). pp. 359-370. ISSN 0169-5347
It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing. To link to this item DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.12.002 Abstract/SummaryThe IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is central in biodiversity conservation, but insufficient resources hamper its long-term growth, updating and consistency. Models or automated calculations can alleviate those challenges by providing standardised estimates required for assessments, or prioritising species for (re-)assessments. However, while numerous scientific papers have proposed such methods, few have been integrated into assessment practice, highlighting a critical research-implementation gap. We believe this gap can be bridged by fostering communication and collaboration between academic researchers and Red List practitioners, and by developing and maintaining user-friendly platforms to automate application of the methods. We propose that developing methods better encompassing Red List criteria, systems and drivers is the next priority to support the Red List.
Download Statistics DownloadsDownloads per month over past year Altmetric Deposit Details University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record |