Accessibility navigation

Should religious associations be allowed to discriminate?

Bilchitz, D. ORCID: (2017) Should religious associations be allowed to discriminate? South African Journal on Human Rights, 27 (2). pp. 219-248. ISSN 0258-7203

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1080/19962126.2011.11865014


Should religious associations be allowed to engage in acts of unfair discrimination on grounds prohibited in the Constitution where they claim their religious doctrines require it? This article argues for this question, in general, to be answered in the negative and seeks in the process to explore the tension between advancing equality in South African society whilst recognising the autonomy of private associations. The Strydom case – dealing with the dismissal of a gay music teacher from a church on grounds of his sexual orientation – provides the backdrop for an analysis of these issues. The article critiques the work of two authors – Patrick Lenta and Stu Woolman – who argue that greater emphasis should be placed on freedom of association in these circumstances even where such associations promote values that are in direct contradiction to those contained in the Constitution. For Lenta, the core concern relates to ‘protecting diversity’ whilst, for Woolman, it involves ensuring a society with a high quantity of ‘social capital’. I shall argue that both authors pay insufficient attention to the South African context, which provides a strong case for a presumption in favour of equality and non-discrimination. Moreover, an engagement with the history of religion in South Africa provides strong reasons to avoid simply leaving a private religious domain alone that is at odds with the political morality of the state. I shall also seek to show that the very values that both Lenta and Woolman are concerned with do not unequivocally support their conclusions and in fact provide a case for the contrary point of view. The arguments I provide seek to establish that courts should generally refuse to condone discrimination on prohibited grounds even where this occurs on the basis of religious doctrines. Ultimately, the article argues for South Africa to adopt an egalitarian form of liberalism that recognises limits on the freedom of religious associations to discriminate as this is necessary to ensure respect for the equal dignity of all individuals in the polity.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
ID Code:103072
Publisher:Taylor & Francis

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation