Accessibility navigation


Purposivism, textualism, and originalism in recent cases on charter interpretation

Sirota, L. (2022) Purposivism, textualism, and originalism in recent cases on charter interpretation. Queens Law Journal, 47 (1). ISSN 0316-778X

[img] Text (Contract) - Other
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

214kB
[img] Text
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

249kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Official URL: https://journal.queenslaw.ca/issues

Abstract/Summary

Both the Supreme Court of Canada and Canadian scholarship often treat debates about constitutional interpretation as settled. This articles shows that this is not so. While it is commonly assumed that purposivism is the authoritative interpretive method, originalism and textualism continue to influence the Supreme Court's decision-making. This article demonstrates their decisive influence on three recent cases interpreting the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. After an overview of the main interpretive approaches present in the Supreme Court's eclectic jurisprudence―pursposivism, living constitutionalism, and originalism―the article critically assesses the majority and minority reasons in R v Stillman, R v Poulin, and Quebec (Attorney General) v 9147-0732 Québec Inc. While all the opinions profess fidelity to purposivism, they are sharply divided about interpretive questions. A close examination of the majority opinions shows that they were, in fact, more textualist or even originalist than they acknowledged. Their endorsement of purposivism and even the ostensible rejection of textualism in Québec Inc are hollow.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
ID Code:104015
Publisher:Queen's University

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation