Accessibility navigation

The Supreme court and the conventions of the constitution

Sirota, L. (2017) The Supreme court and the conventions of the constitution. The Supreme Court law Review, 78. ISSN 0225-0108

Full text not archived in this repository.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Official URL:


Conventions are among the most important rules of the Canadian constitution. Yet orthodox legal theory does not recognize them as being rules of law, a view which the Supreme Court of Canada endorsed in the Patriation Reference. Nevertheless, both before and after the Patriation Reference, the Court's jurisprudence engaged with existing or alleged constitutional conventions. This article reviews this jurisprudence, and the scholarly commentary that responded to it. It concludes that the Court's endorsement of the orthodox view that there exists a rigid separation between conventions and law was poorly justified, and ought to be abandoned.

Item Type:Article
Divisions:Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
ID Code:104114
Publisher:Osgoode Hall Law School of York University

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation