Summer sea ice floe perimeter density in the Arctic: high-resolution optical satellite imagery and model evaluation
Wang, Y., Hwang, B., Bateson, A. W.
It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing. To link to this item DOI: 10.5194/tc-17-3575-2023 Abstract/SummarySize distribution of sea ice floes is an important component for sea ice thermodynamic and dynamic processes, particularly in the marginal ice zone. Recently processes related to the floe size distribution (FSD) have been incorporated into sea ice models, but the sparsity of existing observations limits the evaluation of FSD models, thus hindering model improvements. In this study, perimeter density has been applied to characterise the floe size distribution for evaluating three FSD models – the Waves-in-Ice module and Power law Floe Size Distribution (WIPoFSD) model and two branches of a fully prognostic floe size-thickness distribution model: CPOM-FSD and FSDv2-WAVE. These models are evaluated against a new FSD dataset derived from high-resolution satellite imagery in the Arctic. The evaluation shows an overall overestimation of floe perimeter density by the models against the observations. Comparison of the floe perimeter density distribution with the observations shows that the models exhibit a much larger proportion for small floes (radius <10–30 m) but a much smaller proportion for large floes (radius >30–50 m). Observations and the WIPoFSD model both show a negative correlation between sea ice concentration and the floe perimeter density, but the two prognostic models (CPOM-FSD and FSDv2-WAVE) show the opposite pattern. These differences between models and the observations may be attributed to limitations in the observations (e.g. the image resolution is not sufficient to detect small floes) or limitations in the model parameterisations, including the use of a global power-law exponent in the WIPoFSD model as well as too weak a floe welding and enhanced wave fracture in the prognostic models.
DownloadsDownloads per month over past year
• Aksenov, Y., Popova, E. E., Yool, A., Nurser, A. J. G., Williams, T. D., Bertino, L., and Bergh, J.: On the future navigability of Arctic sea routes: High-resolution projections of the Arctic Ocean and sea ice, Mar. Policy, 75, 300–317, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.12.027, 2017.
• Aksenov, Y., Rynders, S., Feltham, D. L., Hosekova, L., Marsh, R., Skliris, N., Bertino, L., Williams, T. D., Popova, E., Yool, A., Nurser, A. J. G., Coward, A., Bricheno, L., Srokosz, M., and Heorton, H.: Safer Operations in Changing Ice-Covered Seas: Approaches and Perspectives, in: IUTAM Symposium on Physics and Mechanics of Sea Ice, edited by: Uhkuri, J. and Polojärvi, A., IUTAM Bookseries, vol 39. Springer, Cham, Espoo, Finland, 241–260, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80439-8_12, 2022.
• Arntsen, A. E., Song, A. J., Perovich, D. K., and Richter-Menge, J. A.: Observations of the summer breakup of an Arctic sea ice cover, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 8057–8063, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065224, 2015.
• Bateson, A. W.: Fragmentation and melting of the sea- sonal sea ice cover, PhD thesis, Department of Meteo- rology, University of Reading, United Kingdom, 293 pp., https://doi.org/10.48683/1926.00098821, 2021a.
• Bateson, A. W.: Simulations of the Arctic sea ice comparing different approaches to modelling the floe size distribution and their respective impacts on the sea ice cover, University of Reading [data set], https://doi.org/10.17864/1947.300, 2021b.
• Bateson, A. W., Feltham, D. L., Schröder, D., Hosekova, L., Ridley, J. K., and Aksenov, Y.: Impact of sea ice floe size distribution on seasonal fragmentation and melt of Arctic sea ice, The Cryosphere, 14, 403–428, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-403-2020, 2020.
• Bateson, A. W., Feltham, D. L., Schröder, D., Wang, Y., Hwang, B., Ridley, J. K., and Aksenov, Y.: Sea ice floe size: its impact on pan-Arctic and local ice mass and required model complexity, The Cryosphere, 16, 2565–2593, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-2565-2022, 2022.
• Bennetts, L. G., O'Farrell, S., and Uotila, P.: Brief communication: Impacts of ocean-wave-induced breakup of Antarctic sea ice via thermodynamics in a stand-alone version of the CICE sea-ice model, The Cryosphere, 11, 1035–1040, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1035-2017, 2017.
• Birnbaum, G. and Lüpkes, C.: A new parameterization of surface drag in the marginal sea ice zone, Tellus A, 54, 107–123, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v54i1.12121, 2002.
• Bitz, C. M., Shell, K. M., Gent, P. R., Bailey, D. A., Danabasoglu, G., Armour, K. C., Holland, M. M., and Kiehl, J. T.: Climate Sensitivity of the Community Climate System Model, Version 4, 25, 3053–3070, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00290.1, 2012.
• Brenner, S., Rainville, L., Thomson, J., Cole, S., and Lee, C.: Comparing Observations and Parameterizations of Ice-Ocean Drag Through an Annual Cycle Across the Beaufort Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 126, e2020JC016977, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016977, 2021.
• Burroughs, S. M. and Tebbens, S. F.: Upper-truncated Power Laws in Natural Systems, Pure Appl. Geophys., 158, 741–757, https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001202, 2001.
• Cooper, V. T., Roach, L. A., Thomson, J., Brenner, S. D., Smith, M. M., Meylan, M. H., and Bitz, C. M.: Wind waves in sea ice of the western Arctic and a global coupled wave-ice model, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 380, 20210258, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0258, 2022.
• Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., Mcnally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J. J., Park, B. K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J. N., and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828, 2011.
• Denton, A. A. and Timmermans, M.-L.: Characterizing the sea-ice floe size distribution in the Canada Basin from high-resolution optical satellite imagery, The Cryosphere, 16, 1563–1578, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-1563-2022, 2022.
• Dumas-Lefebvre, E. and Dumont, D.: Aerial observations of sea ice breakup by ship waves, The Cryosphere, 17, 827–842, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-827-2023, 2023.
• Dumont, D.: Marginal ice zone dynamics: history, definitions and research perspectives, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 380, 20210253, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0253, 2022.
• Feltham, D. L.: Granular flow in the marginal ice zone, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 363, 1677–1700, https://doi.org/10.1098/RSTA.2005.1601, 2005.
• Gherardi, M. and Lagomarsino, M. C.: Characterizing the size and shape of sea ice floes, Sci. Rep., 5, 10226, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10226, 2015.
• Herman, A.: Sea-ice floe-size distribution in the context of spontaneous scaling emergence in stochastic systems, Phys. Rev. E, 81, 066123, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.066123, 2010.
• Herman, A.: Wave-induced stress and breaking of sea ice in a coupled hydrodynamic discrete-element wave–ice model, The Cryosphere, 11, 2711–2725, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2711-2017, 2017.
• Herman, A., Evers, K.-U., and Reimer, N.: Floe-size distributions in laboratory ice broken by waves, The Cryosphere, 12, 685–699, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-685-2018, 2018.
• Herman, A., Wenta, M., and Cheng, S.: Sizes and Shapes of Sea Ice Floes Broken by Waves – A Case Study From the East Antarctic Coast, Front. Earth Sci., 9, 655977, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.655977, 2021.
• Holt, B. and Martin, S.: The effect of a storm on the 1992 summer sea ice cover of the Beaufort, Chukchi, and East Siberian Seas, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 106, 1017–1032, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC000110, 2001.
• Horvat, C.: Marginal ice zone fraction benchmarks sea ice and climate model skill, Nat. Commun., 12, 2221, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22004-7, 2021.
• Horvat, C. and Roach, L. A.: WIFF1.0: a hybrid machine-learning-based parameterization of wave-induced sea ice floe fracture, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 803–814, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-803-2022, 2022.
• Horvat, C. and Tziperman, E.: A prognostic model of the sea-ice floe size and thickness distribution, The Cryosphere, 9, 2119–2134, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-2119-2015, 2015.
• Horvat, C. and Tziperman, E.: The evolution of scaling laws in the sea ice floe size distribution, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 7630–7650, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012573, 2017.
• Horvat, C., Tziperman, E., and Campin, J. M.: Interaction of sea ice floe size, ocean eddies, and sea ice melting, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 8083–8090, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069742, 2016.
• Horvat, C., Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E., and Petty, A.: Observing Waves in Sea Ice With ICESat-2, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL087629, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087629, 2020.
• Hosekova, L., Aksenov, Y., Coward, A., Williams, T., Bertino, L., and Nurser, A. J. G.: Modelling Sea Ice and Surface Wave Interactions in Polar Regions, in: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, 15–18 December 2015, San Francisco, USA, GC34A-06, https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm15/webprogram/Paper72536.html (last access: 22 August 2023), 2015.
• Hunke, E. C., Lipscomb, W. H., Turner, A. K., Jeffery, N., and Elliott, S.: CICE: the Los Alamos Sea Ice Model Documentation and Software User’s Manual Version 5.1 LA-CC-06-012, Tech. Rep., Los Alamos National Laboratory, https://svn-ccsm-models.cgd.ucar.edu/cesm1/alphas/branches/cesm1_5_alpha04c_timers/components/cice/src/doc/cicedoc.pdf (last access: 14 August 2023), 2015.
• Hwang, B., Ren, J., McCormack, S., Berry, C., Ayed, I. Ben, Graber, H. C., and Aptoula, E.: A practical algorithm for the retrieval of floe size distribution of Arctic sea ice from high-resolution satellite Synthetic Aperture Radar imagery, Elem. Sci. Anthr., 5, 38, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.154, 2017a.
• Hwang, B., Wilkinson, J., Maksym, T., Graber, H. C., Schweiger, A., Horvat, C., Perovich, D. K., Arntsen, A. E., Stanton, T. P., Ren, J., and Wadhams, P.: Winter-to-summer transition of Arctic sea ice breakup and floe size distribution in the Beaufort Sea, Elem. Sci. Anthr., 5, 40, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.232, 2017b.
• Hwang, B. and Wang, Y.: Multi-scale satellite observation of the Arctic sea ice : a new insight into the life cycle of floe size distribution, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 380, 20210259, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0259, 2022.
• Hwang, B. and Wang, Y.: High-resolution floe size distribution of Arctic sea ice 2000–2014 (Version 1.0), NERC EDS UK Polar Data Centre [data set], https://doi.org/10.5285/6d65b406-237c-425d-9356-39b77ac30e85, 2023.
• Japan Meteorological Agency: JRA-55: Japanese 55-year reanalysis, daily 3-hourly and 6-hourly data, Japan Meteorological Agency [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/D6HH6H41, 2013.
• Kanamitsu, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Woollen, J., Yang, S. K., Hnilo, J. J., Fiorino, M., and Potter, G. L.: NCEP-DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 1631–1644, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631, 2002.
• Kergomard, C.: Analyse morphometrique de la zone marginale de la banquise polaire au nord-ouest du Spitsberg a partir de l'imagerie SPOT panchromatique, Bulletin-Société Française de Photogrammétrie et de Télédétection, 115, 17–19, 1989.
• Kohout, A. L. and Meylan, M. H.: An elastic plate model for wave attenuation and ice floe breaking in the marginal ice zone, J. Geophys. Res., 113, C09016, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004434, 2008.
• Kwok, R.: Declassified high-resolution visible imagery for Arctic sea ice investigations: An overview, Remote Sens. Environ., 142, 44–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.11.015, 2014.
• Kwok, R. and Untersteiner, N.: New high-resolution images of summer arctic Sea ice, Eos, 92, 53–54, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011EO070002, 2011.
• LAND INFO Satellite Imagery Search Portal: https://search.landinfo.com/, last access: 8 August 2023.
• Lüpkes, C., Gryanik, V. M., Hartmann, J., and Andreas, E. L.: A parametrization, based on sea ice morphology, of the neutral atmospheric drag coefficients for weather prediction and climate models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D13112, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017630, 2012.
• Martin, T., Tsamados, M., Schroeder, D., and Feltham, D. L.: The impact of variable sea ice roughness on changes in Arctic Ocean surface stress: A model study, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 121, 1931–1952, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011186, 2016.
• Meier, W. N., F. Fetterer, M. Savoie, S. Mallory, R. Duerr, and J. Stroeve: NOAA/NSIDC Climate Data Record of Passive Microwave Sea Ice Concentration, Version 3, National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) [data set], https://doi.org/10.7265/N59P2ZTG, 2017.
• Meier, W. N., Petty, A., Hendricks, S., Perovich, D., Farrell, S., Webster, M., Divine, D., Gerland, S., Kaleschke, L., Ricker, R., and Tian-Kunze, X.: Sea ice, in: NOAA Arctic Report Card 2022, edited by: M. L. Druckenmiller, R. L. Thoman, and T. A. Moon, NOAA, 22-06, 40–48, https://doi.org/10.25923/xyp2-vz45, 2022.
• Melsheimer, C. and Spreen, G.: AMSR2 ASI sea ice concentration data, Arctic, version 5.4 (NetCDF), PANGAEA [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.898399, 2019.
• Melsheimer, C. and Spreen, G.: AMSR-E ASI sea ice concentration data, Arctic, version 5.4 (NetCDF), PANGAEA [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.919777, 2020.
• Meylan, M. H., Horvat, C., Bitz, C. M., and Bennetts, L. G.: A floe size dependent scattering model in two- and three-dimensions for wave attenuation by ice floes, Ocean Model., 161, 101779, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2021.101779, 2021.
• Mokus, N. G. A. and Montiel, F.: Wave-triggered breakup in the marginal ice zone generates lognormal floe size distributions: a simulation study, The Cryosphere, 16, 4447–4472, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4447-2022, 2022.
• Montiel, F. and Mokus, N.: Theoretical framework for the emergent floe size distribution in the marginal ice zone: the case for log-normality, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 380, 20210257, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0257, 2022.
• Montiel, F. and Squire, V. A.: Modelling wave-induced sea ice break-up in the marginal ice zone, Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 473, 20170258, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2017.0258, 2017.
• Montiel, F., Squire, V. A., and Bennetts, L. G.: Attenuation and directional spreading of ocean wave spectra in the marginal ice zone, J. Fluid Mech., 790, 492–522, https://doi.org/10.1017/JFM.2016.21, 2016.
• Passerotti, G., Bennetts, L. G., von Bock und Polach, F., Alberello, A., Puolakka, O., Dolatshah, A., Monbaliu, J., and Toffoli, A.: Interactions between Irregular Wave Fields and Sea Ice: A Physical Model for Wave Attenuation and Ice Breakup in an Ice Tank, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 52, 1431–1446, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-21-0238.1, 2022.
• Perovich, D. K.: Aerial observations of the evolution of ice surface conditions during summer, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8048, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000449, 2002.
• Perovich, D. K. and Jones, K. F.: The seasonal evolution of sea ice floe size distribution, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 119, 8767–8777, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010136, 2014.
• Peng, G., Meier, W. N., Scott, D. J., and Savoie, M. H.: A long-term and reproducible passive microwave sea ice concentration data record for climate studies and monitoring, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 311–318, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-5-311-2013, 2013.
• Petty, A. A., Holland, P. R., and Feltham, D. L.: Sea ice and the ocean mixed layer over the Antarctic shelf seas, The Cryosphere, 8, 761–783, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-761-2014, 2014.
• Pringle, D. J., Eicken, H., Trodahl, H. J., and Backstrom, L. G. E.: Thermal conductivity of landfast Antarctic and Arctic sea ice, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 112, C04017, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003641, 2007.
• Ren, J., Hwang, B., Murray, P., Sakhalkar, S., and McCormack, S.: Effective SAR sea ice image segmentation and touch floe separation using a combined multi-stage approach, in: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 26–31 July 2015, Milan, Italy, 1040–1043, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7325947, 2015.
• Roach, L. A.: Model output: CICE experiments with varying floe and wave physics, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3463580, 2019.
• Roach, L. A., Horvat, C., Dean, S. M., and Bitz, C. M.: An Emergent Sea Ice Floe Size Distribution in a Global Coupled Ocean-Sea Ice Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 4322–4337, https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JC013692, 2018a.
• Roach, L. A., Smith, M. M., and Dean, S. M.: Quantifying Growth of Pancake Sea Ice Floes Using Images From Drifting Buoys, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 2851–2866, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013693, 2018b.
• Roach, L. A., Bitz, C. M., Horvat, C., and Dean, S. M.: Advances in Modeling Interactions Between Sea Ice and Ocean Surface Waves, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 11, 4167–4181, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001836, 2019.
• Rolph, R. J., Feltham, D. L., and Schröder, D.: Changes of the Arctic marginal ice zone during the satellite era, The Cryosphere, 14, 1971–1984, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1971-2020, 2020.
• Rothrock, D. A. and Thorndike, A. S.: Measuring the sea ice floe size distribution, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 6477, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC089iC04p06477, 1984.
• Rynders, S.: Impact of surface waves on sea ice and ocean in the polar regions, PhD thesis, University of Southampton, United Kingdom, http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/428655 (last access: 14 August 2023), 2017.
• Rynders, S., Aksenov, Y., Marsh, R., Skrilis, N., Hosekova, L., Feltham, D., Bertino, l., Srokosz, M., and Williams, T.: Sea hazards on offshore structures: waves, currents, tides and sea ice combined, in: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 8–13 April 2018, Vienna, Austria, vol. 20, EGU2018-8577-2, https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2018/EGU2018-8577-2.pdf (last access: 22 August 2023), 2018.
• Satellite Imaging Corporation, WorldView-1 Satellite Sensor: WorldView-1 Satellite Image, https://www.satimagingcorp.com/satellite-sensors/worldview-1/, last access: 16 February 2023.
• Satellite Imaging Corporation, WorldView-2 Satellite Sensor: WorldView-2 Satellite Image, https://www.satimagingcorp.com/satellite-sensors/worldview-2/, last access: 16 February 2023.
• Schröder, D., Feltham, D. L., Tsamados, M., Ridout, A., and Tilling, R.: New insight from CryoSat-2 sea ice thickness for sea ice modelling, The Cryosphere, 13, 125–139, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-125-2019, 2019.
• Shen, H. H., Hibler, W. D., and Leppäranta, M.: On applying granular flow theory to a deforming broken ice field, Acta Mech., 63, 143–160, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01182545, 1986.
• Spreen, G., Kaleschke, L., and Heygster, G.: Sea ice remote sensing using AMSR-E 89-GHz channels, J. Geophys. Res., 113, C02S03, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003384, 2008.
• Steele, M.: Sea ice melting and floe geometry in a simple ice-ocean model, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 17729–17738, https://doi.org/10.1029/92jc01755, 1992.
• Steele, M., Morison, J. H., and Untersteiner, N.: The partition of air-ice-ocean momentum exchange as a function of ice concentration, floe size, and draft, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 94, 12739–12750, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC094IC09P12739, 1989.
• Steer, A., Worby, A., and Heil, P.: Observed changes in sea-ice floe size distribution during early summer in the western Weddell Sea, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 55, 933–942, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.12.016, 2008.
• Stern, H. L., Schweiger, A. J., Stark, M., Zhang, J., Steele, M., and Hwang, B.: Seasonal evolution of the sea-ice floe size distribution in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas, Elem. Sci. Anthr., 6, 48, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.305, 2018a.
• Stern, H. L., Schweiger, A. J., Zhang, J., and Steele, M.: On reconciling disparate studies of the sea-ice floe size distribution, Elem. Sci. Anthr., 6, 49, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.304, 2018b.
• Strong, C. and Rigor, I. G.: Arctic marginal ice zone trending wider in summer and narrower in winter, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4864–4868, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50928, 2013.
• The WAVEWATCH III Development Group: User manual and system documentation of WAVEWATCH III, version 5.16, Tech. Note 329, NOAA/NWS/NCEP/MMAB, College Park, MD, https://polar.ncep.noaa.gov/waves/wavewatch/manual.v5.16.pdf (last access: 14 August 2023), 2016.
• Thomson, J. and Rogers, W. E.: Swell and sea in the emerging Arctic Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 3136–3140, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059983, 2014.
• Toyota, T., Takatsuji, S., and Nakayama, M.: Characteristics of sea ice floe size distribution in the seasonal ice zone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L02616, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024556, 2006.
• Toyota, T., Haas, C., and Tamura, T.: Size distribution and shape properties of relatively small sea-ice floes in the Antarctic marginal ice zone in late winter, Deep-Sea Res. Part II, 58, 1182–1193, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.10.034, 2011.
• Toyota, T., Kohout, A., and Fraser, A. D.: Formation processes of sea ice floe size distribution in the interior pack and its relationship to the marginal ice zone off East Antarctica, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 131, 28–40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.10.003, 2016.
• Tsamados, M., Feltham, D. L., Schroeder, D., Flocco, D., Farrell, S. L., Kurtz, N., Laxon, S. W., and Bacon, S.: Impact of Variable Atmospheric and Oceanic Form Drag on Simulations of Arctic Sea Ice, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 44, 1329–1353, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-13-0215.1, 2014.
• Tsamados, M., Feltham, D., Petty, A., Schroeder, D., and Flocco, D.: Processes controlling surface, bottom and lateral melt of Arctic sea ice in a state of the art sea ice model, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 373, 20140167, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0167, 2015.
• United States Geological Survey: Global Fiducials Library, United States Geological Survey [data set], https://www.usgs.gov/global-fiducials-library-data-access-portal, last access: 8 August 2023.
• Wang, Y., Holt, B., Erick Rogers, W., Thomson, J., and Shen, H. H.: Wind and wave influences on sea ice floe size and leads in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas during the summer-fall transition 2014, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 121, 1502–1525, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011349, 2016.
• Williams, T. D., Bennetts, L. G., Squire, V. A., Dumont, D., and Bertino, L.: Wave-ice interactions in the marginal ice zone. Part 1: Theoretical foundations, Ocean Model., 71, 81–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.05.010, 2013a.
• Williams, T. D., Bennetts, L. G., Squire, V. A., Dumont, D., and Bertino, L.: Wave-ice interactions in the marginal ice zone. Part 2: Numerical implementation and sensitivity studies along 1D transects of the ocean surface, Ocean Model., 71, 92–101, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2013.05.011, 2013b.
• World Meteorological Organization: WMO sea-ice nomenclature, terminology, codes, illustrated glossary and international system of sea-ice symbols, Tech. Rep., WMO No. 259, https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=4651 (last access: 20 July 2022), 2014.
• Zhang, J., Schweiger, A., Steele, M., and Stern, H.: Sea ice floe size distribution in the marginal ice zone: Theory and numerical experiments, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 120, 3484–3498, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC010770, 2015.
• Zhang, J., Stern, H., Hwang, B., Schweiger, A., Steele, M., Stark, M., and Graber, H. C.: Modeling the seasonal evolution of the Arctic sea ice floe size distribution, Elem. Sci. Anthr., 4, 000126, https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000126, 2016. University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record |
University of Reading
CentAUR: Central Archive at the University of Reading
Accessibility navigation
Summer sea ice floe perimeter density in the Arctic: high-resolution optical satellite imagery and model evaluation
Wang, Y., Hwang, B., Bateson, A. W.
It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing. To link to this item DOI: 10.5194/tc-17-3575-2023 Abstract/SummarySize distribution of sea ice floes is an important component for sea ice thermodynamic and dynamic processes, particularly in the marginal ice zone. Recently processes related to the floe size distribution (FSD) have been incorporated into sea ice models, but the sparsity of existing observations limits the evaluation of FSD models, thus hindering model improvements. In this study, perimeter density has been applied to characterise the floe size distribution for evaluating three FSD models – the Waves-in-Ice module and Power law Floe Size Distribution (WIPoFSD) model and two branches of a fully prognostic floe size-thickness distribution model: CPOM-FSD and FSDv2-WAVE. These models are evaluated against a new FSD dataset derived from high-resolution satellite imagery in the Arctic. The evaluation shows an overall overestimation of floe perimeter density by the models against the observations. Comparison of the floe perimeter density distribution with the observations shows that the models exhibit a much larger proportion for small floes (radius <10–30 m) but a much smaller proportion for large floes (radius >30–50 m). Observations and the WIPoFSD model both show a negative correlation between sea ice concentration and the floe perimeter density, but the two prognostic models (CPOM-FSD and FSDv2-WAVE) show the opposite pattern. These differences between models and the observations may be attributed to limitations in the observations (e.g. the image resolution is not sufficient to detect small floes) or limitations in the model parameterisations, including the use of a global power-law exponent in the WIPoFSD model as well as too weak a floe welding and enhanced wave fracture in the prognostic models.
Download Statistics DownloadsDownloads per month over past year Altmetric Deposit Details References University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record |
Lists
Lists
