Accessibility navigation


Why are pension schemes frozen, and how does a freeze affect the employer’s risk?

Zhao, Z. and Sutcliffe, C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0187-487X (2024) Why are pension schemes frozen, and how does a freeze affect the employer’s risk? International Review of Economics and Finance, 94. 103393. ISSN 1873-8036

[img] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only until 18 June 2025.
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

647kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.103393

Abstract/Summary

Defined benefit (DB) pension schemes involve substantial risks and costs for employers. So employers have frozen (or closed) their schemes. Using data on firms in the FTSE 100 index, we study the characteristics of employers who hard froze (no new members or accruals) their DB scheme, and the effect of this on the employer’s risk. We find that the probability of a hard freeze is a negative function of employer size, operating cash flow and unionization; and a positive function of a previous soft freeze (no new members). We also find that a hard freeze reduces total, unsystematic and credit risk; and increases systematic and asset risk.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Henley Business School > ICMA Centre
ID Code:116844
Publisher:Elsevier

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation