Accessibility navigation


Reconciling Britain’s agricultural trade policy initiatives with world trade rules: 1960–1975

Swinbank, A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2526-2026 (2024) Reconciling Britain’s agricultural trade policy initiatives with world trade rules: 1960–1975. Contemporary British History. ISSN 1743-7997

[img] Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

740kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1080/13619462.2024.2382864

Abstract/Summary

Between 1960 and 1972 successive British governments explored, and sometimes pursued, a series of agricultural trade policy initiatives designed to shift the burden of supporting UK farmers from taxpayers to consumers, and to reduce the UK’s agri-food imports by expanding home production. These included a minimum import price scheme for cereals; a Selective Expansion Programme; debate about Agriculture’s Import Saving Role; and 1970 proposals for a fundamental change to farm policy that would apply whether or not the UK joined the European Communities (EC). Prior to EC membership the rules of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), bilateral agreements with a number of countries, and pressure from the UK’s trading partners (particularly the United States) constrained its room for manoeuvre. Consequently, this dimension of farm policy could not safely be left to agriculture ministers and the Treasury, but was one that involved other departments, and prime ministers, as it necessitated detailed international negotiations. Following EC entry, GATT Article XXIV deliberations and the UK’s renegotiation of its terms of entry failed to secure meaningful reform of the common agricultural policy (CAP). The 1975 referendum confirming EC membership meant the UK no longer had an independent agri-food trade policy.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Life Sciences > School of Agriculture, Policy and Development > Department of Agri-Food Economics & Marketing
ID Code:117439
Publisher:Routledge

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation