Accessibility navigation


Trading and market quality: evidence from the London Stock Exchange

Hartavi, Y. (2020) Trading and market quality: evidence from the London Stock Exchange. PhD thesis, University of Reading

[img] Text - Thesis
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

4MB
[img] Text - Thesis Deposit Form
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

143kB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.48683/1926.00120457

Abstract/Summary

This dissertation comprises four empirical essays on market quality. The first essay develops a reliable method for trader classification that identifies unique types of traders in the London Stock Exchange (LSE). We investigate the trading behaviour of high-frequency-traders (HFTs) and assess the impact of different styles of trading on liquidity and volatility. To achieve this, we utilise a comprehensive UK dataset covering two years of trade activity. We identify 76 HFTs, classified into four distinct sub-groups, and 51 registered market-makers actively trading in the LSE markets. The second essay investigates volatility in London’s Alternative Investment Market (AIM), the stock market for smaller and growing companies. Specifically, it provides new evidence comparing the relative riskiness of stocks trading on AIM to corresponding stocks trading on the Main Market, the flagship market of LSE for large-cap and blue-chip stocks. The purpose of this particular essay is to elucidate the perceived riskiness of AIM and measure the risk of comparable stocks on both markets. In this study, we test the hypothesis that AIM is inherently riskier than the Main Market, as stocks trading in small-cap/junior markets might be considered riskier than established stocks trading on primary exchange markets. The analysis of switchers indicates that the differences in volatility when stocks switched between AIM and the Main Market are extremely small, often not statistically significant, and tend – if anything – to exhibit a slightly lower volatility when a stock is listed on AIM. The third paper examines how trader participation is associated with liquidity. We find that although HFT activity does not harm liquidity as a whole, the evidence is mixed at the sub-group level. The final essay explores trader behaviour in periods of extreme short-term volatility and studies the effect of trader aggressiveness on liquidity. Few previous studies have answered research questions similar to the ones addressed in this study, which is the first to examine extreme short-term volatility in the LSE markets.

Item Type:Thesis (PhD)
Thesis Supervisor:Dufour, A.
Thesis/Report Department:Henley Business School
Identification Number/DOI:https://doi.org/10.48683/1926.00120457
Divisions:Henley Business School
ID Code:120457
Date on Title Page:December 2019

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation