Downloads

• Aaker, D. (1991). Brand Equity. New York: Free Press. • Alvesson, M. & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247–271. • Alvesson, M. & Sandberg, J. (2020). The problematizing review: A counterpoint to Elsbach and Van Knippenberg’s argument for integrative reviews. Journal of Management Studies, 57(6), 1290–1304. • Bardhi, F. & Eckhardt, G. (2017). Liquid consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 582–597. • Bartels, R. (1968). The general theory of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 32(1), 29–33. • Belk, R. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168. • Bettman, J., Luce, M., & Payne, J. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 187–217. • Bierman, S. (2011). A probability primer. https://web.archive.org/web/20110720051423/http://www.cs.stedwards.edu/chem/Chemistry/CHEM4341/BayesPrimer2.pdf. • Brodie, R. (2017). Enhancing theory development in the domain of relationship marketing: how to avoid the danger of getting stuck in the middle. Journal of Services Marketing, 31(1), 20–23. • Brodie, R., Hollebeek, L., Ilic, A., & Juric, B. (2011). Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions & implications for research in service marketing. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 252–271. • Brodie, R. & Peters, L. (2020). New directions for service research: Refreshing the process of theorizing to increase contribution. Journal of Services Marketing, 34(3), 415–428. • Clark, M., Lages, C. & Hollebeek, L. (2020), Friend or foe? Customer engagement’s value-based effects on fellow customers and the firm. Journal of Business Research, 121(Dec), 549–556. • Cloutier, C. & Langley, A. (2020). What makes a process theoretical contribution? Organization Theory, 1, 1–32. • Corley, K. & Gioia, D. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. • Cornelissen, J. (2017). Editor’s comments: Developing propositions, a process model, or a typology? Addressing the challenges of writing theory without a boilerplate. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 1–9. • Cropanzano, R. (2009). Writing nonempirical articles for Journal of Management: General thoughts. Journal of Management, 35, 1304–1311. • Cunliffe, A. (2022). Must I grow a pair of balls to theorize about theory in organization and management studies? Organization Theory, 3, 1–28. • Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. • Davis, M. (1971). That's interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(2), 309–344. • Delbridge, R. & Fiss, P. (2013). Styles of theorizing and the social organization of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 325–331. • Donthu, N., Lim, W.M., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2023). Tribute to a marketing legend: Commemorating the contributions of Shelby D. Hunt with implications for the future of marketing. Journal of Business Research, 164, 113954. • Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pattnaik, D., & Lim, W.M. (2021). A bibliometric retrospection of marketing from the lens of psychology: Insights from Psychology & Marketing. Psychology & Marketing, 38(5), 834–865. • Dootson, P., Johnston, K., Lings, I., & Beatson, A. (2018). Tactics to deter deviant consumer behavior: A research agenda. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 35(6), 577–587. • Doty, H. and Glick, W. (1994). Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 230–251. • Embley, D. (2011). Handbook of Conceptual Modeling, Berlin: Springer. • Feldman, M. & Orlikowski, W. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240–1253. • Fiss, P. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. • Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–373. • Giesler, M., & Thompson, C. (2016). A tutorial in consumer research: Process theorization in cultural consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(4), 497–508. • Gilson, L. & Goldberg, C. (20150. Editors’ comment: So, what is a conceptual paper? Group & Organization Management, 40(2), 127–130. • Gioia, D. & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. • Golder, P., Dekimpe, M., An, J., Van Heerde, H., Kim, D., & Alba, J. (2023). Learning from data: An empirics-first approach to relevant knowledge generation. Journal of Marketing, 7(3) 319–336. • Graebner, M., Knott, A., Lieberman, M., & Mitchell, W. (2023). Empirical inquiry without hypotheses: A question-driven, phenomenon-based approach to strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 44(1), 3–10. • Grant, A. & Pollock, T. (2011). Publishing in AMJ-Part 3: Setting the hook. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 873–879. • Grewal, D., Guha, A., Satorino, C., & Schweiger, E. (2021). Artificial intelligence: The light and the darkness. Journal of Business Research, 136(Nov), 229–236. • Gummesson, E. (2017). From relationship marketing to total relationship marketing and beyond. Journal of Services Marketing, 31(1), 16–19. • Hanson, N. (1958). Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. • Hill, R. & Ward, J. (1989). Mood manipulation in marketing research: An examination of potential confounding effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(1), 97–104. • Holbrook, M. & Hirschmann, E. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132–140. • Hollebeek, L. (2018). Individual-level cultural consumer engagement styles: Conceptualization, propositions, and implications. International Marketing Review, 35(1), 42–71. • Hollebeek, L., Hammedi, W., & Sprott, D. (2023). Consumer engagement, stress, and conservation of resources theory: A review, conceptual development, and future research agenda. Psychology & Marketing, 40(5), 926–937. • Hollebeek, L., Kumar, V. & Srivastava, R. (2022). From customer-, to actor-, to stakeholder engagement: Taking stock, conceptualization, and future directions. Journal of Service Research, 25(2), 328–343. • Hollebeek, L., Kumar, V., Srivastava, R., & Clark, M. (2023). Moving the stakeholder journey forward. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 51, 23–49. • Hollebeek, L., Menidjel, C., Sarstedt, M., Jansson, J., & Urbonavicius, S. (2024). Engaging consumers through artificially intelligent technologies: Systematic review, conceptual model, and further research. Psychology & Marketing, 41(4), 880–898. • Hollebeek, L., Sprott, D., Sigurdsson, V., & Clark, M. (2022). Social influence and stakeholder engagement behavior conformity, compliance, and reactance. Psychology & Marketing, 39(1), 90–100. • Hollebeek, L., Sprott, D., Urbonavicius, S., Sigurdsson, V., Clark, M., Riisalu, R., & Smith, D. (2022). Beyond the big five: The effect of machiavellian, narcissistic, and psychopathic personality traits on stakeholder engagement. Psychology & Marketing, 39(6), 1230–1243. • Hollebeek, L., Srivastava, R., & Chen, T. (2019). S-D logic-informed customer engagement: Integrative framework, revised fundamental propositions, and application to CRM. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(1), 161–185. • Homer, S., & Lim, W.M. (2024). Theory development in a globalized world: Bridging “doing as the Romans do” with “understanding why the Romans do it”. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 43(3), 127–138. • Huang, M., & Rust, R. (2022). A framework for collaborative artificial intelligence in marketing. Journal of Retailing, 98(2), 209–223. • Hulland, J. (2019). In through the out door. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(1), 1–3. • Hulland, J. (2020). Conceptual review papers: Revisiting existing research to develop and refine theory. AMS Review, 10, 27–35. • Hunt, S. (1983). General theories and the fundamental explanada of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 9–17. • Hunt, S. (1994). On rethinking marketing: Our discipline, our practice, our methods. European Journal of Marketing, 28(3), 13–25. • Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10, 18–26. • Jaccard, J., & Jacoby, J. (2020). Theory construction and model-building skills: A practical guide for social scientists. New York: Guilford Press. • Jaworski, B., & Kohli, A. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70. • Kassarjian, H. (1982). The development of consumer behavior theory. Advances in Consumer Research, 9(1), 20–22. • Keller, K. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22. • Key, T., Clark, T., Ferrell, O., Stewart, D., & Pitt, L. (2020). Marketing’s theoretical and conceptual value proposition: Opportunities to address marketing’s influence. AMS Review, 10, 151–167. • Kilduff, M. (2006). Publishing theory. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 252–255. • Kindermann, B., Wentzel, D., Antons, D., & Salge, T. (2024). Conceptual contributions in marketing scholarship: Patterns, mechanisms, and rebalancing options. Journal of Marketing, 88(3), 29–49. • Kordig, C. (1978). Discovery and justification. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. • Koscholke, J. & Schippers, M. (2016). Against relative overlap measures of coherence. Synthese, 193, 2805–2814. • Krafft, M., Goetz, O., Mantrala, M., Sotgiu, F., & Tillmanns, S. (2015). The evolution of marketing channel research domains and methodologies: An integrative review and future directions. Journal of Retailing, 91(4), 569–585. • Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. • Kumar, V., Rajan, B., Gupta, S., & Dalla Pozza, I. (2019). Customer engagement in service. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(1), 138–160. • Kumar, V., Rajan, B., Salunkhe, U., & Joag, S. (2022). Relating the dark side of new-age technologies and customer technostress. Psychology & Marketing, 39(12), 2240–2259. • Kumar, V. & Ramachandran, D. (2021). Developing firms’ growth approaches as a multidimensional decision to enhance key stakeholders’ wellbeing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38, 402–424. • Lafferty, B., Lueth, A., & McCafferty, R. (2016). An evolutionary process model of cause-related marketing and systematic review of the empirical literature. Psychology & Marketing, 33(11), 951–970. • Lee, J. & Kim, H. (2023). Conceptual articles may disrupt the field of marketing but continue to decline in numbers: Evidence from a GPT-assisted study. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.14724. • Leung, X. Viglia G., & Buhalis D. (2024). Immersive advertising via co-creation-lessons from the visitor economy: How to enhance experiential competitiveness with an “attract, convert, and delight” strategy. Journal of Advertising Research. • Li, L., Fehrer, J., Brodie, R., & Juric, B. (2021). Trajectories of influential conceptual articles in service research. Journal of Service Management, 32(5), 645–672. • Lim, L., Tuli, K., & Grewal, R. (2020). Customer satisfaction and its impact on the future costs of selling. Journal of Marketing, 84(4), 23–44. • Lim, W.M., & Weissmann, M. (2023). Toward a theory of behavioral control. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 31(1), 185–211. • Lim, W.M., Kumar, S., & Ali, F. (2022). Advancing knowledge through literature reviews: ‘What’, ‘why’, and ‘how to contribute’. Service Industries Journal, 42(7–8), 481–513. • Lindgreen, A., Di Benedetto, C., Brodie, R., & Jaakkola, E. (2021). How to develop great conceptual frameworks for business-to-business marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 94, A2–A10. • Locke, E. (2007). The case for inductive theory building. Journal of Management, 33(6), 867–890. • Locke, K. & Golden-Biddle, K. (1997). Constructing opportunities for contribution: Structuring intertextual coherence and “problematizing” in organizational studies. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1023–1062. • MacInnis, D. (2004). Where have all the papers gone? Reflections on the decline of conceptual articles. Association for Consumer Research Newsletter, Spring, 1–3. • MacInnis, D. (2011). A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(Jul), 136–154. • MacInnis, D. (2017). Developing conceptual articles for JCR: Research curation. Journal of Consumer Research. https://academic.oup.com/jcr/pages/developing_conceptual_articles_for_jcr • MacKenzie, S. (2003). The dangers of poor construct conceptualization. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(3), 323–326. • Mariani, M., Perez-Vega, R., & Wirtz, J. (2022). AI in marketing, consumer research and psychology: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Psychology & Marketing, 39(4), 755–776. • McCracken, G. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 310–321. • Mele, C., Colurcio, M., & Russo-Spena, T. (2014). Research traditions of innovation: Goods-dominant logic, the resource-based approach, and service-dominant logic. Managing Service Quality, 24(6), 612–642. • Meredith, J. (1993). Theory building through conceptual methods. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 13(5), 3–11. • Mick, D. (1986). Consumer research and semiotics: Exploring the morphology of signs, symbols, and significance. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2), 196–213. • Miller, F. & Allen, C. (2012). How does celebrity meaning transfer? Investigating the process of meaning transfer with celebrity affiliates and mature brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 443–452. • Miller, S. & Childers, D. (2012). Probability and Random Processes (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press. • Mitroff, I., Alpaslan, M., & Green, S. (2004). Crises as ill-structured messes. International Studies Review, 6(1), 175–182. • Montecchi, M., Campbell, C., Sotgiu, F., Snyder, H., Kumar, S., & Wirtz, J. (2023). Forward-looking literature reviews and conceptual articles in psychology and marketing. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15206793/cfpforwardlooking. • Moorman, C., Van Heerde, H., Moreau, C., & Palmatier, R. (2019). Challenging the boundaries of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 83(5), 1–4. • Nishant, R., Kennedy, M., Corbett, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence for sustainability: Challenges, opportunities, and a research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 53, 102104. • Ofir, C. & Simonson, I. (2007). The effect of stating expectations on customer satisfaction and shopping experience. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(1), 164–174. • Oliver, R. (1989). Processing of the satisfaction response in consumption: A suggested framework and research propositions. Journal of Customer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 2, 1–16. • Palmatier, R., Houston, M., & Hulland, J. (2018). Review articles: Purpose, process, and structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 1–5. • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49, 41–50. • Parvatiyar, A. & Sheth, J. (2021). Toward an integrative theory of marketing. AMS Review, 11, 432–445. • Patriotta, G. (2017). Crafting papers for publication: Novelty and convention in academic writing. Journal of Management Studies, 54(5), 747–759. • Peterson, R. & Crittenden, V. (2012). On the impactfulness of theory and review articles. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2(1), 1–4. • Prahalad, C. & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14. • Reese, S. (2023). Writing the conceptual article: A practical guide. Digital Journalism, 11(7) 1195–1210. • Shepherd, D. & Suddaby, R. (2017). Theory building: A review and integration. Journal of Management, 43(10), 59–86. • Shepherd, D. & Sutliffe, K. (2011). Inductive top-down theorizing: A source of new theories of organization. Academy of Management Review, 36, 361–380. • Sheth, J. (1973). A model of industrial buyer behavior. Journal of Marketing, 37(4), 50–56. • Sheth, J. & Parvatiyar, A. (1995). Relationship marketing in consumer markets: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 255–271. • Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. • Srivastava, R., Shervani, T., & Fahey, L. (1998). Market-based assets and shareholder value: A framework for analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 2–18. • Storbacka, K., Brodie, R., Böhmann, T., Maglio, P., & Nenonen, S. (2016). Actor engagement as a micro-foundation for value co-creation. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3008–3017. • Sundström, A., Ahmadi, Z., & Hyder, A. (2016). Market and innovation orientation typology: Proposition and illustrations. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 34(3), 376–393. • Ulaga, W., Kleinaltenkamp, M., Kashyap, V., & Eggert, A. (2021). Advancing marketing theory and practice: Guidelines for crafting research propositions. AMS Review, 11, 395–406. • Van de Ven, A. (1989). Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 486–489. • Van de Ven, A. & Johnson, P. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821. • Vargo, S. & Koskela-Huotari, K. (2020). Advancing conceptual-only articles in marketing. AMS Review, 10, 1–5. • Vargo, S. & Lusch, R. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5–23. • Vargo, S. & Lusch, R. (2017). S-D logic 2025. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34, 46–67. • Vink, J., Koskela-Huotari, K., Tronvoll, B., Edvardsson, B., & Wetter-Edman, K. (2021). Service ecosystem design: Propositions, process model, and future research agenda. Journal of Service Research, 24(2), 168–186. • Weick, K. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 385–390. • Whetten, D. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495. • Woodruff, R. (1997). Customer value: The next source of competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25, 139–153. • Yadav, M. (2010). The decline of conceptual articles and implications for knowledge development. Journal of Marketing, 74(1), 1–19. • Yadav, M. (2014). Enhancing theory development in marketing. AMS Review, 4, 1–4. • Zaichkowsky, J. (1986) Conceptualizing involvement. Journal of Advertising, 15(2), 4–34. • Zaltman, G. (2000). Consumer researchers: Take a hike! Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 423–428. • Zaltman, G., LeMasters, K., & Heffring, M. (1982). Theory Construction in Marketing: Some Thoughts on Thinking. New York: Wiley. • Zavestoski, S. (2002). Anticonsumption attitudes. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 121–126. • Zeithaml, V. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.