Avatars' phygital social presence in the metaverse: an engaged theory perspectiveSprott, D. E., Hollebeek, L. D., Sigurdsson, V., Clark, M. K. and Urbonavicius, S. (2025) Avatars' phygital social presence in the metaverse: an engaged theory perspective. Psychology & Marketing. ISSN 1520-6793
It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing. To link to this item DOI: 10.1002/mar.22191 Abstract/SummaryWhile prior authors have explored the notions of human and/or automated social presence, these concepts have been predominantly assessed either individually or as mutually exclusive theoretical entities. However, we draw on engaged theory to develop the hybrid concept of phygital social presence that comprises aspects of both the human and automated social presence of metaverse avatars. We define phygital social presence as the degree to which a metaverse avatar instils the feeling in other users that they are in the company of a social entity, as elicited by the avatar’s (a) human social presence (i.e., the actions taken by its human user, in line with engaged theory’s ways of acting), and (b) automated social presence (i.e., the avatar’s embodiment or its appearance, look, design, and the character that these emit, in line with engaged theory’s ways of being). We next propose a conceptual framework and a set of propositions, which suggest that metaverse avatars’ (a) human social presence primarily impacts metaverse users’ positive or negative behavioral engagement in the metaverse, and (b) automated social presence chiefly influences users’ positive or negative cognitive and emotional engagement. Moreover, an avatar’s ways of relating, as also informed by engaged theory, primarily impact users’ positive or negative social engagement.
DownloadsDownloads per month over past year
• Aldred, J. (2011). From synthespian to avatar: Re-framing the digital human in final fantasy and the polar express. Mediascape, 1-12.
• Aljaroodi, H., Adam, M., Chiong, R., & Teubner, T. (2019). Avatars and embodied agents in experimental information systems research: A systematic review and conceptual framework. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 23, https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v23i0.1841.
• Al-Kfairy, M., Alomari, A., Al-Bashayreh, M., Alfandi, O., & Tubishat, M. (2024). Unveiling the Metaverse: A survey of user perceptions and the impact of usability, social influence and interoperability. Heliyon, 10(10), e31413.
• Anderson, B. (2003). Imagined Communities, London: Verso.
• Arya, V., Sethi, D., & Hollebeek, L. (2024). Using augmented reality to strengthen consumer/brand relationships: The case of luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10.1002/cb.2419.
• Baek, E., Choo, H., & Lee, S. (2018). Using warmth as the visual design of a store: Intimacy, relational needs, and approach intentions. Journal of Business Research, 88, 91-101.
• Ball, M. (2022). The metaverse: And how it will revolutionize everything. Liveright Publishing.
• Barrera, K., & Shah, D. (2023). Marketing in the Metaverse: Conceptual understanding, framework, and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 155, 113420.
• Batat, W. (2024). Why is the traditional marketing mix dead? Towards the “experiential marketing mix” (7E), a strategic framework for business experience design in the phygital age. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 32(2), 101-113.
• Berman, R., & Slobin, D. (2013). Different ways of relating events: Introduction to the study. In: Relating Events in Narrative (pp. 1-16). Psychology Press.
• Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Gregg, J. (2001, May). The networked minds measure of social presence: Pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. 4th Annual International Workshop on Presence, Philadelphia, PA (pp. 1-9).
• Biocca, F. & Harms, C. (2002). Defining and measuring social presence - Contribution to the networked minds theory and measure. International Workshop on Presence, 517, 1-36.
• Blut, M., Wang, C., Wünderlich, N., & Brock, C. (2021). Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: A meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(4), 632-658.
• Bowden, J., Luoma-Aho, V. & Solem, B. (2017). Engagement valence duality and spillover effects in online brand communities. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27(4), 877-897.
• Bozkurt, S., Gligor, D., & Hollebeek, L. (2021). Ethnicity's effect on social media‐based comment intention: Comparing minority and majority consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 38(11), 1895-1910.
• Bozkurt, S., Gligor, D., & Sumlin, C. (2024). Understanding the effects of firms' unresponsiveness on social media toward customer feedback on customers' engagement: The impact of ethnicity. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-09-2023-0317.
• Brodie, R., Hollebeek, L., Jurić, B., & Ilić, A. (2011). Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 252-271.
• Brodie, R., Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L. (2013). Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 105-114.
• Bryson, S. L., & Fissel, E. (2024). Is it (cyber) bullying? Assessing adult perceptions of bullying and cyberbullying using a mixed-methods approach. Deviant Behavior, 45(7), 1011-1027.
• Čaić, M., Avelino, J., Mahr, D., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Bernardino, A. (2020). Robotic versus human coaches for active aging: An automated social presence perspective. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(4), 867-882.
• Capecchi, D. (2023). The principle of action and reaction according to Newton. Encyclopedia, 3(2), 705-720.
• Cheng, G., Li, W., He, M., & Liao, L. (2024). Exploring consumer responses to official endorsement: Roles of credibility and attractiveness attributes in live streaming. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1371343.
• Cheng, Y., Mei, S., Zhong, W., & Gao, X. (2023). Managing consumer privacy risk: The effects of privacy breach insurance. Electronic Commerce Research, 1-35.
• Claffey, E., & Brady, M. (2019). An empirical study of the impact of consumer emotional engagement and affective commitment in firm-hosted virtual communities. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(11-12), 1047-1079.
• Clark, M., Lages, C., & Hollebeek, L. (2020). Friend or foe? Customer engagement’s value-based effects on fellow customers and the firm. Journal of Business Research, 121, 549-556.
• Cudworth, E. & Cudworth, E. (2005). Embodiment, materiality and symbolic regimes. In: Cudworth, E. (Ed.), Developing Ecofeminist Theory, 128-155.
• Davenport, T., Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Bressgott, T. (2020). How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48 (1), 24-42.
• Davis, A., Murphy, J., Owens, D. Khazanchi, D., & Zigurs, I. (2009). Avatars, people, and virtual worlds: Foundations for research in metaverses. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(2), 90-117
• Dhaoui, C., & Webster, C. (2021). Brand and consumer engagement behaviors on Facebook brand pages: Let's have a (positive) conversation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38(1), 155-175.
• Dia, H. (2023). Developing a governance framework for a commercially successful, inclusive, and safe metaverse (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
• Dinh, C., & Park, S. (2023). How to increase consumer intention to use Chatbots? An empirical analysis of hedonic and utilitarian motivations on social presence and the moderating effects of fear across generations. Electronic Commerce Research, 1-41.
• Dwivedi, Y., Hughes, L., Wang, Y., Alalwan, A. et al. (2023). Metaverse marketing: How the metaverse will shape the future of consumer research and practice. Psychology & Marketing, 40(4), 750-776.
• Ernstson, H., Lawhon, M., & Duminy, J. (2014). Conceptual vectors of African urbanism: ‘Engaged theory-making’ and ‘platforms of engagement.’ Regional Studies, 48(9), 1563-1577.
• Falchuk, B., Loeb, S., & Neff, R. (2018). The social metaverse: Battle for privacy. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 37(2), 52-61.
• Farah, M., Ramadan, Z., & Nassereddine, Y. (2024). When digital spaces matter: The influence of uniqueness and place attachment on self‐identity expression with brands using generative AI on the metaverse. Psychology & Marketing, https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22097.
• Ferdous, A., Akareem, H., Viswanathan, M., & Ringer, A. (2024). Boosting app-based mobile financial services engagement in B2B subsistence marketplaces: The roles of marketing strategy and app design. Industrial Marketing Management, 119(May), 147-161.
• Finne, Å. & Grönroos, C. (2017). Communication-in-use: Customer-integrated marketing communication. European Journal of Marketing, 51(3), 445-463.
• Flavián, C., Ibáñez-Sánchez, S., Orús, C., & Barta, S. (2024). The dark side of the metaverse: The role of gamification in event virtualization. International Journal of Information Management, 75, 102726.
• Frank, D., Dipalma, J., Steinmann, S., & Otterbring, T. (2024). How the presence of employee avatars affects metaverse shopping behavior: “Can I help you buy condoms?” Virtual sales promotions in embarrassing shopping settings. Journal of Advertising Research, 64(3), 335-352.
• Fribourg, R., Argelaguet, F., Lécuyer, A., & Hoyet, L. (2020). Avatar and sense of embodiment: Studying the relative preference between appearance, control and point of view. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 26(5), 2062-2072.
• Fukuda, R., Nomura, T., & Akamatsu, N. (2024). Translating virtual product scarcity in gaming to real‐world brand value. Psychology & Marketing, https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22071.
• Garry, A. (2008). Intersections, social change, and “engaged” theories: Implications of North American feminism. Pacific and American Studies, 99-111.
• Ghali, Z., Rather, R., & Khan, I. (2024). Investigating metaverse marketing-enabled consumers’ social presence, attachment, engagement and (re)visit intentions. Journal of Retailing & Consumer Services, 77(Mar), 103671.
• Gooch, D. & Watts, L. (2009). The impact of social presence on feelings of closeness in personal relationships. Interacting with Computers, 27(6), 661-674.
• Graf, B., Antoni, C., Mülller, R., Schischke, D., & Ellwart, T. (2023). Effects of automated communication on team members’ activity and social presence awareness, commitment, and motivation in human-autonomy teams. Computers in Human Behavior, 149(Dec), 107925.
• Grewal, D., Kopalle, P. K., & Hulland, J. (2024). Addressing the greatest global challenges (UN SDGs) with a marketing lens. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1-10.
• Groeger, L., Moroko, L. & Hollebeek, L. (2016). Capturing value from non-paying consumers’ engagement behaviours: Field evidence and development of a theoretical model. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(3-4), 190-209.
• Gunawardena, C. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2&3), 147-166.
• Gutuleac, R., Baima, G., Rizzo, C., & Bresciani, S. (2024). Will virtual influencers overcome the uncanny valley? The moderating role of social cues. Psychology & Marketing, https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21989.
• Hadi, R., Melumad, S., & Park, E. (2024). The metaverse: A new digital frontier for consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 34(1), 142-166.
• Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2010). Relating conversational expressiveness to social presence and acceptance of an assistive social robot. Virtual Reality, 14, 77-84.
• Heidicker, P., Langbehn, E., & Steinicke, F. (2017, March). Influence of avatar appearance on presence in social VR. 2017 IEEE symposium on 3D user interfaces (3DUI) (pp. 233-234). IEEE.
• Heinonen, K. (2018). Positive and negative valence influencing consumer engagement. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 28(2), 147-169.
• Hennig-Thurau, T., Aliman, D., Herting, A., Cziehso, G., Linder, M., & Kübler, R. (2023). Social interactions in the metaverse: Framework, initial evidence, and research roadmap. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 51, 889-913.
• Hollebeek, L., Glynn, M., & Brodie, R. (2014). Consumer brand engagement in social media: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 149-165.
• Hollebeek, L., Menidjel, C., Sarstedt, M., Jansson, J., & Urbonavicius, S. (2024). Engaging consumers through artificially intelligent technologies: Systematic review, conceptual model, and further research. Psychology & Marketing, 41(4), 880-898.
• Hollebeek, L., Sprott, D., & Brady, M. (2021). Rise of the machines? Customer engagement in automated service interactions. Journal of Service Research, 24(1), 3-8.
• Hollebeek, L., Sprott, D., Sigurdsson, V., & Clark, M. (2022). Social influence and stakeholder engagement behavior conformity, compliance, and reactance. Psychology & Marketing, 39(1), 90-100.
• Hollebeek, L., Srivastava, R., & Chen, T. (2019). S-D logic–informed customer engagement: Integrative framework, revised fundamental propositions, and application to CRM. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(1), 161-185.
• Huang, X., Wei, M., & Xiang, S. (2024). When AI meets internet public welfare: a study of the impact of intelligent customer service avatars on individual online donation behavior. Current Psychology, 43(15), 13402-13427.
• Hutson, J., & Ratican, J. (2023). Individuality and the collective in AI agents: Explorations of shared consciousness and digital homunculi in the metaverse for cultural heritage. Metaverse, 4(2), 10.54517/met.v4i2.2276.
• James, P. (2014). Urban sustainability in theory and practice: Circles of sustainability. Routledge.
• James, P. (2017). On being religious: Towards an alternative theory of religion and secularity. The Occasional Papers, Institute for Culture and Society (tOPICS), 8(2), https://doi.org/10.4225/35/59b9c5d4e6f85.
• James, P. & Verrest, H. (2015). Beyond the network effect: Towards an alternative understanding of global urban organizations. In: Gupta, J., Pfeffer, K., Verrest, H., & Ros-Tonen, M. (Eds.), Geographies of Urban Governance. Cham: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21272-2_4.
• Jia, G., Yang, F., Wang, G., Hong, B., & You, R. (2011). A study of mega project from a perspective of social conflict theory. International Journal of project management, 29(7), 817-827.
• Jin, S. & Youn, S. (2023). Social presence and imagery processing as predictors of chatbot continuance intention in human-AI interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(9), 1874-1886.
• Kalender, Y. & Guzmán, F. (2024). What drives consumers to engage in immersive technologies? A consumer metaverse engagement motivation model. Psychology & Marketing, https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22158.
• Khan, I., Hollebeek, L., Fatma, M., Islam, J. & Riivits-Arkonsuo, I. (2020). Customer Experience and Commitment in Retailing: Does Customer Age Matter? Journal of Retailing & Consumer Services, 57(Nov), 102219.
• Kim, H., & Park, M. (2024). When digital celebrity talks to you: How human-like virtual influencers satisfy consumer's experience through social presence on social media endorsements. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 76, 103581.
• Krishna, A., Luangrath, A., & Peck, J. (2024). A review of touch research in consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 34(2), 359-381.
• Kumar, A., & Shankar, A. (2024). Investigating the role of metaverse influencers’ attributes for the next generation of services. Journal of Services Marketing, 38(7), 816-838.
• Kumar, P., Vrontis, D., & Pallonetto, F. (2024). Cognitive engagement with AI‐enabled technologies and value creation in healthcare. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(2), 389-404.
• Kumar, V., Rajan, B., Gupta, S., & Dalla Pozza, I. (2019). Customer engagement in service. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(1), 138-160.
• Lei, X. & Liu, F. (2024). How service robots facilitate user self-disclosure: The role of personality, animacy, and automated social presence. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2316368.
• Li, Z., Zheng, Z., Wang, L., & Liu, Y. (2024). Animatable gaussians: Learning pose-dependent gaussian maps for high-fidelity human avatar modeling. Proceedings of IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 19711-19722).
• Liao, X., Zheng, Y., Shi, G., & Bu, H. (2024). Automated social presence in artificial-intelligence services: Conceptualization, scale development, and validation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 203, 123377.
• Lievonen, M., Bowden, J., & Luoma-Aho, V. (2023). Towards a typology of negative engagement behavior in social media. Service Industries Journal, 43(3-4), 238-259.
• Lin, Y.-T., Doong, H.-S., & Eisingerich, A. (2021). Avatar design of virtual salespeople: Mitigation of recommendation conflicts. Journal of Service Research, 24(1), 141-159.
• Luo, X., Cheah, J., & Lim, X. J. (2024). Boosting customers’ impulsive buying tendency in live-streaming commerce: The role of customer engagement and deal proneness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 77, 103644.
• Machneva, M., Evans, A., & Stavrova, O. (2022). Consensus and (lack of) accuracy in perceptions of avatar trustworthiness. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 107017.
• MacInnis, D. (2011). A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 136-154.
• Magee, L., Scerri, A., James, P., Thom, J. et al. (2023). Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 15(1), 225-243.
• Malodia, S., Kaur, P., Ractham, P., Sakashita, M., & Dhir, A. (2022). Why do people avoid and postpone the use of voice assistants for transactional purposes? A perspective from decision avoidance theory. Journal of Business Research, 146, 605-618.
• Mele, C. & Russo-Spena, T. (2022). The architecture of the phygital customer journey: A dynamic interplay between systems of insights and systems of engagement. European Journal of Marketing, 56(1), 72-91.
• Miao, F., Kozlenkova, I., Wang, H., Xie, T., & Palmatier, R. (2022). An emerging theory of avatar marketing. Journal of Marketing, 86(1), 67–90.
• Mishra, S., Ewing, M., & Cooper, H. (2022). Artificial intelligence focus and firm performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(6), 1176-1197.
• Oh, C., Bailenson, J., & Welch, G. (2018). A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 409295.
• Oh, H., Kim, J., Chang, J., Park, N., & Lee, S. (2023). Social benefits of living in the metaverse: The relationships among social presence, supportive interaction, social self-efficacy, and feelings of loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107498.
• Payal, R., Sharma, N., & Dwivedi, Y. (2024). Unlocking the impact of brand engagement in the metaverse on Real-World purchase intentions: Analyzing Pre-Adoption behavior in a futuristic technology platform. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 65, 101381.
• Ribeiro, A., Vieira, V., Alves, L., & Maciel, C. (2024). Vishnu: An approach to support the personalization of self-expressive avatars using context-awareness. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 185, 103243.
• Riva, G., & Wiederhold, B. (2022). What the metaverse is (really) and why we need to know about it. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 25(6), 355-359.
• Roy, S., Balaji, M., Soutar, G., Lassar, W., & Roy, R. (2018). Customer engagement behavior in individualistic and collectivistic markets. Journal of Business Research, 86(May), 281-290.
• Ruiz-Equihua, D., Romero, J., Casalo, L., & Loureiro, S. (2023). Smart speakers and customer experience in service contexts. Psychology & Marketing, 40(11), 2326-2340.
• Sestino, A., & D’Angelo, A. (2023). My doctor is an avatar! The effect of anthropomorphism and emotional receptivity on individuals' intention to use digital-based healthcare services. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 191, 122505.
• Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. New York: Wiley.
• Sivunen, A., & Nordbäck, E. (2015). Social presence as a multi-dimensional group construct in 3D virtual environments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(1), 19-36.
• So, K., Li, J., King, C. (2024). Social media-based customer engagement and stickiness: A longitudinal investigation. Psychology & Marketing, 41(7), 1597-1613.
• Sowmya, G., Chakraborty, D., Polisetty, A., Khorana, S., & Buhalis, D. (2023). Use of metaverse in socializing: Application of the big five personality traits framework. Psychology & Marketing, 40(10), 2132-2150.
• Statista (2024). Metaverse – Worldwide. Accessed (Nov 1, 2024) at: https://www.statista.com/outlook/amo/metaverse/worldwide#:~:text=The%20Metaverse%20market%20is%20projected,US%24507.8bn%20by%202030.
• Steger, M. & James, P. (2019). Globalization matters: Engaging the global in unsettled times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Suk, H., & Laine, T. H. (2023). Influence of avatar facial appearance on users’ perceived embodiment and presence in immersive virtual reality. Electronics, 12(3), 583.
• Syailendra, E. (2024). Malaysia's strategic approach: Unpacking the “action‐reaction spiral” logic in the South China Sea. Asian Politics & Policy, 16(3), 357-376.
• Teng, C., Dennis, A., & Dennis, A. (2023). Avatar-mediated communication and social identification. Journal of Management Information Systems, 40(4), 1171-1201.
• Tu, C., McIsaac, M., Sujo-Montes, L., & Armfield, S. (2012). Is there a mobile social presence? Educational Media International, 49(4), 247-261.
• Van Doorn, J., Mende, M., Noble, S., Hulland, J., Ostrom, A., Grewal, D., & Petersen, J. (2017). DomoArigato Mr. Roboto: Emergence of automated social presence in organizational frontlines and customers’ service experiences. Journal of Service Research, 20(1), 43-58.
• Yang, Y., Jun, Z., & Ting, G. (2024). How do username and avatar affect people's engagement with native advertising on social media: From the self‐disclosure perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 41(6), 1289-1317.
• Yildiz, H., Reiter, A., Vrontis, D., & Mouline, J. (2024). Interacting in virtual reality: When the Proteus effect stimulates 3D MMORPG players to buy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, 123205.
• Yoganathan, V., Osburg, V., Kunz, W., & Toporowski, W. (2021). Check-in at the robo-desk: Effects of automated social presence on social cognition and service implications. Tourism Management, 85, 104309.
• Zeng, N., Ryding, D., Vignali, G., & Pantano, E. (2024). AR atmospherics and virtual social presence impacts on customer experience and customer engagement behaviours. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-08-2023-0520.
• Zhu, R. & Yi, C. (2024). Avatar design in metaverse: The effects of avatar-user similarity in procedural and creative tasks. Internet Research, 34(1), 39-57. University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record |