Benchmark CCSD(T) and density functional theory calculations of biologically relevant catecholic systems

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access)
- Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
[thumbnail of R2_Benchmark-Catechol-DFT-Cafiero-2025.docx]
Text
- Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Harle, J. and Cafiero, M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4895-1783 (2025) Benchmark CCSD(T) and density functional theory calculations of biologically relevant catecholic systems. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 129 (20). pp. 4879-4894. ISSN 1520-6106 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c08356

Abstract/Summary

Approximate complete basis set CCSD(T), MP2 and HF calculations are performed for thirty-two catechol-containing complexes. These complexes, which include metal-coordination, hydrogen-bonding, pi-stacking, and other, weaker interactions, are representative of the types of non-covalent interactions that catechols undergo when binding to proteins in the body, such as in the biosynthesis of dopamine. The catechols studied include the neutral catechol and dinitrocatechol molecules, as well as the charged dopamine and DOPAC molecules. Calculations with twenty-one density functional theory methods with triple and quadruple-zeta basis sets are evaluated against the CCSD(T) benchmarks to ascertain their accuracy. It is found that MN15, M06-2X-D3, wB97XD, wB97M-V and CAM-B3LYP-D3 provide good accuracy when compared with CCSD(T)/CBS calculations for these systems and may be used for the study of relevant biological systems. The local DPLNO CCSD(T) method is also evaluated against the CCSD(T)/CBS energies for a subset of the complexes and found to agree within 1-3%, with a maximum difference of 0.26 Ha.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/122669
Identification Number/DOI 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c08356
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy > Department of Chemistry
Publisher American Chemical Society
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record