Planning education and the field of practice: a Bourdieusian analysis

[thumbnail of TPR-12-24-OA-0050.R2_Proof_hi.pdf]
Preview
Text
- Accepted Version

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Parker, G. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3079-4377 and Maidment, C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9158-6910 (2025) Planning education and the field of practice: a Bourdieusian analysis. Town Planning Review, 97 (1). ISSN 1478-341X doi: 10.3828/tpr.2025.20

Abstract/Summary

In the context of change and pressures to refigure formal planning education, the paper draws on Bourdieu’s field theory to frame the experience of graduates in initial planning education in the UK. The research situates education in a contested professional context. The findings hold import for the profession given that relevant knowledge is expanding, core knowledge must be retained and instilled early, while training about specific policy or process can be maintained over a longer run. Greater integration and coordination of education and training must be developed if the profession is to maintain quality and integrity, as well as relevance.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/123006
Identification Number/DOI 10.3828/tpr.2025.20
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Real Estate and Planning
Publisher Liverpool University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record