Inconsistent survey histograms and point forecasts revisited

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access)
- Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
[thumbnail of Wasserstein_distance (15).pdf]
Text
- Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Clements, M. P. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6329-1341 (2025) Inconsistent survey histograms and point forecasts revisited. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 236. 107097. ISSN 2328-7616 doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107097

Abstract/Summary

Past analyses of surveys of professional forecasters’ histogram and point forecasts indicate that the two are not always consistent. The point forecasts are either systematically higher or lower than the corresponding histogram means, depending on whether we consider inflation or GDP growth. We consider whether inconsistencies are related to delayed updating of the histogram forecasts, or to the reaction of the two types of forecasts to new information, and whether inconsistent pairs typically imply less accurate point or histogram forecasts. We also re-consider explanations related to the complexity of the task on an extended dataset.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/123156
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107097
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record