Social and societal issues in AAL

Downloads

1. Ahmad, I., Asghar, Z., Kumar, T., Li, G., Manzoor, A., Mikhaylov, K., Harjula, E.: Emerging technologies for next generation remote health care and assisted living. IEEE Access 10, 56094–56132 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3177278 2. Ake-Kob, A., Aleksic, S., Alexin, Z., Blazeviciene, A., Cartolovni, A., Colonna, L., Dantas, C., Fedosov, A., Fosch-Villaronga, E., Florez-Revuelta, F., He, Z., Jevremovic, A., Adrzej, K., Lambrinos, L., Lutz, C., Maleševi´c, A., Mekovec, R., Miguel, C., Mujirishvili, T., Pajalic, Z., Perez Vega, R., Pierscionek, B.K., Ravi, S., Sarf, P., Solanas, A., Tamò-Larrieux, A.: Position paper on ethical, legal and social challenges linked to audio- and video-based AAL solutions. SSRN Electron. J. (2022). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4282341 3. Ake-Kob, A., Blazeviciene, A., Colonna, L., Cartolovni, A., Dantas, C., Fedosov, A., Colantonio, S.: State of the art on ethical, legal, and social issues linked to audio-and video-based AAL solutions. SSRN Electron. J. (2021). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3994835 4. Allen, A.L.: Gender and privacy in cyberspace. Stanford Law Rev. 1175–1200 (2000) 5. Appelboom, G., Camacho, E., Abraham, M.E., Bruce, S.S., Dumont, E.L., Zacharia, B.E., Connolly, E.S.: Smart wearable body sensors for patient self-assessment and monitoring. Arch. Publ. Health 72(1), 1–9 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-3258-72-28 6. Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J.F., Rahwan, I.: The moral machine experiment. Nature 563(7729), 59–64 (2018) 7. Bechtold, U., Stauder, N., Fieder, M.: Attitudes towards technology: insights on rarely discussed influences on older adults’ willingness to adopt active assisted living (AAL). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 21(5), 628 (2024) 8. Berridge, C., Grigorovich, A.: Algorithmic harms and digital ageism in the use of surveillance technologies in nursing homes. Front. Sociol. 7, 957,246 (2022) 9. Berry, J.W.: Acculturation and adaptation. In: Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 3rd edn., pp. 291–326. Allyn & Bacon (1997) 10. Bertel, D., Teles, S., Strohmeier, F., Vieira-Marques, P., Schmitter, P., Ruscher, S., Paúl, C., Kofler, A.C.: High tech, high touch: integrating digital and human AAL advisory services for 326 C. Lutz et al. older adults. In: 4th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health (ICT4AWE), Funchal, Portugal, 22–23 March 2018, pp. 241–249. SciTePress (2018) 11. Bodó, B.: Mediated trust: a theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators. New Med. Soc. 23(9), 2668–2690 (2021) 12. Botsman, R.: Who can you trust?: How technology brought us together–and why it could drive us apart. Penguin, UK (2017) 13. Boujarwah, F.A., Riedl, M.O., Abowd, G.D., Arriaga, R.I.: React: intelligent authoring of social skills instructional modules for adolescents with high-functioning autism. ACM SIGACCESS Access. Comput. 99, 13–23 (2011) 14. Brewer, R., Pierce, C., Upadhyay, P., Park, L.: An empirical study of older adult’s voice assistant use for health information seeking. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. (TiiS) 12(2), 1–32 (2022) 15. Brewer, R.N., Harrington, C., Heldreth, C.: Envisioning equitable speech technologies for black older adults. In: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 379–388 (2023) 16. Browne, S.: Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Duke University Press (2015) 17. Büchi, M., Festic, N., Latzer, M.: The chilling effects of digital dataveillance: a theoretical model and an empirical research agenda. Big Data Soc. 9(1), 1–14 (2022). https://doi.org/10. 1177/20539517211065368 18. Büchi, M., Fosch-Villaronga, E., Lutz, C., Tamò-Larrieux, A., Velidi, S., Viljoen, S.: The chilling effects of algorithmic profiling: mapping the issues. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 36, 105,367 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105367 19. Cartolovni, A., Dantas, C., Maleševi´c, A., Ilgaz, A.: Ethical issues in AAL. In: Salah, ˇ A.A., Colonna, L., Florez-Revuelta, F. (eds.) Privacy-Aware Monitoring for Assisted Living. Springer, Cham (2025) 20. Chaharsoughi, N.T., Ahmadifaraz, M., Kahangi, L.S.: The impact of digital technologies in nursing care and their application: a narrative review. J. Multidiscipl. Care 11(3), 149–156 (2022). https://doi.org/10.34172/jmdc.2022.1127 21. Charpignon, M.L., Carrel, A., Jiang, Y., Kwaga, T., Cantada, B., Hyslop, T., Cox, C.E., Haines, K., Koomson, V., Dumas, G., et al.: Going beyond the means: exploring the role of bias from digital determinants of health in technologies. PLOS Digital Health 2(10), e0000,244 (2023) 22. Cheshire, C.: Online trust, trustworthiness, or assurance? Daedalus 140(4), 49–58 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00114 23. Chi, N.C., Demiris, G.: A systematic review of telehealth tools and interventions to support family caregivers. J. Telemed. Telecare 21(1), 37–44 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1357633X14562734 24. Choy, T., Baker, E., Stavropoulos, K.: Systemic racism in EEG research: considerations and potential solutions. Affect. Sci. 3(1), 14–20 (2022) 25. Chung, J., Thompson, H.J., Joe, J., Hall, A., Demiris, G.: Examining Korean and Korean American older adults’ perceived acceptability of home-based monitoring technologies in the context of culture. Inform. Health Soc. Care 42(1), 61–76 (2017) 26. Cirillo, D., Catuara-Solarz, S., Morey, C., Guney, E., Subirats, L., Mellino, S., Gigante, A., Valencia, A., Rementeria, M.J., Chadha, A.S., et al.: Sex and gender differences and biases in artificial intelligence for biomedicine and healthcare. NPJ Dig. Med. 3(1), 1–11 (2020) 27. Claes, V., Devriendt, E., Tournoy, J., Milisen, K.: Attitudes and perceptions of adults of 60 years and older towards in-home monitoring of the activities of daily living with contactless sensors: an explorative study. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 52(1), 134–148 (2015) 28. Colnar, S., Penger, S., Grah, B., Dimovski, V.: Digital transformation of integrated care: literature review and research agenda. IFAC-PapersOnLine 53(2), 16890–16895 (2020). https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1221 29. Colonna, L., Riva, G.M.: The legal and regulatory issues in AAL: the case of smart mirrors. In: Salah, A.A., Colonna, L., Florez-Revuelta, F. (eds.) Privacy-Aware Monitoring for Assisted Living. Springer, Cham (2025) 13 Social and Societal Issues in AAL 327 30. Courtney, K.L., Demeris, G., Rantz, M., Skubic, M.: Needing smart home technologies: the perspectives of older adults in continuing care retirement communities. J. Innov. Health Inform. 16(3), 195–201 (2008) 31. Crawford, K.: The Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale University Press (2021) 32. Cresswell, K., Sheikh, A.: Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: an interpretative review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 82(5), e73– e86 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.10.007 33. Dalmer, N., Ellison, K., Katz, S., Marshall, B.: Ageing, embodiment and datafication: dynamics of power in digital health and care technologies. Int. J. Ageing Later Life 15(2), 77–101 (2022) 34. Dunlop, D.D., Song, J., Manheim, L.M., Daviglus, M.L., Chang, R.W.: Racial/ethnic differences in the development of disability among older adults. Am. J. Public Health 97(12), 2209–2215 (2007) 35. European Commission: Final evaluation of the active and assisted living research and development programme. Technical report, European Commission, Brussels (2022). https://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2022:0404:FIN:EN:PDF 36. Fedosov, A., Zavolokina, L., Krumhard, S., Huang, E.M.: “This could be the day i die”: unpacking interpersonal and systems trust in a local sharing economy community. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA’23. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2023). https://doi. org/10.1145/3544549.3585744 37. Feiner, J.R., Severinghaus, J.W., Bickler, P.E.: Dark skin decreases the accuracy of pulse oximeters at low oxygen saturation: the effects of oximeter probe type and gender. Anesth. Analg. 105(6), S18–S23 (2007) 38. Fenu, G., Medda, G., Marras, M., Meloni, G.: Improving fairness in speaker recognition. In: Proceedings of the 2020 European Symposium on Software Engineering, pp. 129–136 (2020) 39. Fosch-Villaronga, E., Van der Hof, S., Lutz, C., Tamò-Larrieux, A.: Toy story or children story? Putting children and their rights at the forefront of the artificial intelligence revolution. AI Soc. 38(1), 133–152 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01295-w 40. Fosch-Villaronga, E., Lutz, C., Tamò-Larrieux, A.: Gathering expert opinions for social robots’ ethical, legal, and societal concerns: findings from four international workshops. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 12(2), 441–458 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00605-z 41. Fotopoulou, A.: Understanding citizen data practices from a feminist perspective. In: Stephansen, H., Trere, E.(eds.) Citizen Media and Practice, pp. 227–242. Routledge (2019) 42. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W.: Trust and tam in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quart. 51–90 (2003) 43. Gilliom, J.: Overseers of the Poor: Surveillance, Resistance, and the Limits of Privacy. University of Chicago Press (2001) 44. Harrington, C.N., Garg, R., Woodward, A., Williams, D.: “It’s kind of like code-switching”: black older adults’ experiences with a voice assistant for health information seeking. In: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–15 (2022) 45. Harris, M.T., Rogers, W.A.: Developing a healthcare technology acceptance model (H-TAM) for older adults with hypertension. Ageing Soc. 43(4), 814–834 (2023) 46. Herold, B., Waller, J., Kushalnagar, R.: Applying the stereotype content model to assess disability bias in popular pre-trained NLP models underlying AI-based assistive technologies. In: Ninth Workshop on Speech and Language Processing for Assistive Technologies (SLPAT2022), pp. 58–65 (2022) 47. Hick, S., Biermann, H., Ziefle, M.: How deep is your trust? A comparative user requirements’ analysis of automation in medical and mobility technologies. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 11(1), 1–13 (2024) 48. Hoffmann, A., Hoffmann, H., Söllner, M.: Fostering initial trust in applications–developing and evaluating requirement patterns for application websites. In: 21st European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Utrecht, The Netherlands (2013) 328 C. Lutz et al. 49. Hofmann, V., Kalluri, P.R., Jurafsky, D., King, S.: AI generates covertly racist decisions about people based on their dialect. Nature 1–8 (2024) 50. Kilcullen, S., Heffernan, E., Hussey, P., Lee, H., Moran, K., Murphy, C., Smeaton, A.F., Timon, C.M., Gallagher, P., Hopper, L.: A theoretical domains framework (TDF) approach to the qualitative analysis of older adults’ intentions to adopt assistive smart home technology. Gerontochnology 21(1) (2022) 51. Kim, E., Bryant, D., Srikanth, D., Howard, A.: Age bias in emotion detection: an analysis of facial emotion recognition performance on young, middle-aged, and older adults. In: Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 638–644 (2021) 52. Koerber, D., Khan, S., Shamsheri, T., Kirubarajan, A., Mehta, S.: Accuracy of heart rate measurement with wrist-worn wearable devices in various skin tones: a systematic review. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 10(6), 2676–2684 (2023) 53. Ku, L., Liu, L.F., Wen, M.J.: Trends and determinants of informal and formal caregiving in the community for disabled elderly people in Taiwan. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 56(2), 370–376 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2012.11.005 54. Ku´zmicz, M.M.: A concept of balance of interest in the context of active assisted living. Dig. Soc. 2(3), 1–30 (2023) 55. Lee, C., Coughlin, J.F.: Perspective: older adults’ adoption of technology: an integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 32(5), 747–759 (2015) 56. Leitner, G., Mitrea, O., Fercher, A.J.: Towards an acceptance model for AAL. In: Human Factors in Computing and Informatics: First International Conference, SouthCHI 2013, Maribor, Slovenia, July 1–3, 2013. Proceedings, pp. 672–679. Springer (2013) 57. Levasseur, M., Généreux, M., Bruneau, J.F., Vanasse, A., Chabot, É., Beaulac, C., Bédard, M.M.: Importance of proximity to resources, social support, transportation and neighborhood security for mobility and social participation in older adults: results from a scoping study. BMC Public Health 15, 1–19 (2015) 58. Li, J., Song, Y.: Formal and informal care. In: Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging. Springer (2019) 59. Light, A.: Trust in collaborative economies and how to study it: relational assets and the making of more-than-strangers. In: Ethnographies of Collaborative Economies across Europe, vol. 13 (2022) 60. López, L., Green, A.R., Tan-McGrory, A., King, R.S., Betancourt, J.R.: Bridging the digital divide in health care: the role of health information technology in addressing racial and ethnic disparities. Joint Comm. J. Qual. Patient Safety 37(10), 437–445 (2011) 61. Louie, W., McColl, D., Nejat, G.: Acceptance and attitudes toward a human-like socially assistive robot by older adults. Assist. Technol. 26(3), 140–150 (2014) 62. Lupton, D., Williamson, B.: The datafied child: the dataveillance of children and implications for their rights. New Med. Soc. 19(5), 780–794 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1461444816686328 63. Lutz, C., Newlands, G.: Privacy and smart speakers: a multi-dimensional approach. Inf. Soc. 37(3), 147–162 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2021.1897914 64. Lutz, C., Schöttler, M., Hoffmann, C.P.: The privacy implications of social robots: scoping review and expert interviews. Mob. Med. Commun. 7(3), 412–434 (2019). https://doi.org/10. 1177/2050157919843961 65. Lutz, C., Tamò, A.: Communicating with robots: antalyzing the interaction between healthcare robots and humans with regards to privacy. In: Guzman, A. (ed.) Human-Machine Communication: Rethinking Communication, Technology, and Ourselves, pp. 145–165. Peter Lang (2018) 66. Martin, K.: Understanding privacy online: development of a social contract approach to privacy. J. Bus. Ethics 137, 551–569 (2016) 67. Milligan, C.: There’s no place like home: place and care in an ageing society. Ashgate (2009) 13 Social and Societal Issues in AAL 329 68. Mittelstadt, B.D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., Floridi, L.: The ethics of algorithms: mapping the debate. Big Data Soc. 3(2) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679 69. Mujirishvili, T., Fedosov, A., Hashemifard, K., Climent-Pérez, P., Florez-Revuelta, F.: “I don’t want to become a number”: examining different stakeholder perspectives on a videobased monitoring system for senior care with inherent privacy protection (by design). In: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’24. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2024). https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3613904.3642164 70. Mujirishvili, T., Maidhof, C., Florez-Revuelta, F., Ziefle, M., Richart-Martinez, M., CabreroGarcía, J.: Acceptance and privacy perceptions toward video-based active and assisted living technologies: scoping review. J. Med. Internet Res. 25, e45,297 (2023) 71. Offermann-van Heek, J., Ziefle, M.: Nothing else matters! trade-offs between perceived benefits and barriers of AAL technology usage. Front. Public Health 7 (2019). https://doi.org/10. 3389/fpubh.2019.00134 72. Olphert, W., Damodaran, L., Balatsoukas, P., Parkinson, C.: Process requirements for building sustainable digital assistive technology for older people. J. Assist. Technol. 3(3), 4–13 (2009) 73. Orellano Colon, E.: Gender differences in the adoption and use of assistive technology (AT) among Hispanics. Am. J. Occup. Therapy 73(4 Supp 1), 7311505,192p1 (2019) 74. Otten, S., Wilkowska, W., Offermann, J., Ziefle, M.: Trust in and acceptance of video-based AAL technologies. In: ICT4AWE, pp. 126–134 (2023) 75. Otten, S., Ziefle, M.: Exploring trust perceptions in the medical context: a qualitative approach to outlining determinants of trust in AAL technology. In: ICT4AWE, pp. 244–253 (2022) 76. Peine, A.: Technology and ageing—theoretical propositions from science and technology studies (STS). In: Neves, B.B., Vetere, F. (eds.) Ageing and Digital Technology, pp. 51–64. Springer (2019) 77. Penney, J.W.: Understanding chilling effects. Minn. Law Rev. 106, 1451–1530 (2022) 78. Pinto, L., Nemorin, S.: Who is the boss? ‘The elf on the shelf’ and the normalization of surveillance. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (2014). https://policyalternatives.ca/ publications/commentary/whos-boss 79. Rantz, M.J., Alexander, G., Galambos, C., Flesner, M.K., Vogelsmeier, A., Hicks, L., Greenwald, L.: The use of bedside electronic medical record to improve quality of care in nursing facilities: a qualitative analysis. CIN: Comput. Inform. Nurs. 29(3), 149–156 (2011). https:// doi.org/10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181f9db79 80. Roberts, C., Mort, M.: Reshaping what counts as care: older people, work and new technologies. Alter 3(2), 138–158 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2009.01.004 81. Roessler, B.J., Mokrosinska, D.: Social Dimensions of Privacy: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge University Press (2015) 82. Sarı, L., Hasegawa-Johnson, M., Yoo, C.D.: Counterfactually fair automatic speech recognition. IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Lang. Process. 29, 3515–3525 (2021) 83. Shaik, T., Tao, X., Higgins, N., Li, L., Gururajan, R., Zhou, X., Acharya, U.R.: Remote patient monitoring using artificial intelligence: current state, applications, and challenges. Wiley Interdiscipl Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 13(2), e1485 (2023). https://doi.org/10. 1002/widm.1485 84. Sharmila, C., Hameed, M.S.: Diaspora: exploring the use of affordances and mobile mediation among migrants’ social connectedness. Migr. Lett. 20(5), 122–144 (2023) 85. Solove, D.J., Schwartz, P.M.: Information Privacy Law. Aspen Publishing (2020) 86. Steele, R., Lo, A., Secombe, C., Wong, Y.K.: Elderly persons’ perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare. Int. J. Med. Inform. 78(12), 788–801 (2009) 87. Steinke, F., Fritsch, T., Brem, D., Simonsen, S.: Requirement of AAL systems: older persons’ trust in sensors and characteristics of AAL technologies. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, PETRA’12. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2413097.2413116 330 C. Lutz et al. 88. Steinke, F., Fritsch, T., Silbermann, L.: Trust in ambient assisted living (AAL)-a systematic review of trust in automation and assistance systems. Int. J. Adv. Life Sci. 4(3–4) (2012) 89. Steinke, F., Ingenhoff, A., Fritsch, T.: Personal remote assistance in ambient assisted living– experimental research of elderly people’s trust and their intention to use. Int. J. HumanComput. Interact. 30(7), 560–574 (2014) 90. Strycharz, J., Segijn, C.M.: Chilling effects as a result of corporate surveillance in digital communication: a comparison between American and Dutch media users. Int. J. Commun. 18, 320–343 (2023) 91. Strycharz, J., Segijn, C.M.: Ethical side-effect of dataveillance in advertising: impact of data collection, trust, privacy concerns and regulatory differences on chilling effects. J. Bus. Res. 173, 114,490 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114490 92. Tamò-Larrieux, A., Guitton, C., Mayer, S., Lutz, C.: Regulating for trust: can law establish trust in artificial intelligence? Regul. Gov. 18(3), 780–801 (2024) 93. Tariq, M.U.: Advanced wearable medical devices and their role in transformative remote health monitoring. In: Transformative Approaches to Patient Literacy and Healthcare Innovation, pp. 308–326. IGI Global (2024) 94. Tellioglu, H.: Integrating ethics by design and co-design principles in the development of ambient assisted living technologies. In: Salah, A.A., Colonna, L., Florez-Revuelta, F. (eds.) Privacy-Aware Monitoring for Assisted Living. Springer, Cham (2025) 95. Tifferet, S.: Gender differences in privacy tendencies on social network sites: a meta-analysis. Comput. Hum. Behav. 93, 1–12 (2019) 96. Van Dijck, J.: Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveill. Soc. 12(2), 197–208 (2014) 97. Venkit, P.N., Wilson, S.: Identification of bias against people with disabilities in sentiment analysis and toxicity detection models. arXiv:2111.13259 (2021) 98. Walker, P., McClaran, N., Zheng, Z., Saxena, N., Gu, G.: BiasHacker: voice command disruption by exploiting speaker biases in automatic speech recognition. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks, pp. 119–124 (2022) 99. Weck, M., Afanassieva, M.: Toward the adoption of digital assistive technology: factors affecting older people’s initial trust formation. Telecommun. Policy 47(2), 102,483 (2023) 100. Wilkowska, W., Offermann-van Heek, J., Florez-Revuelta, F., Ziefle, M.: Video cameras for lifelogging at home: preferred visualization modes, acceptance, and privacy perceptions among german and turkish participants. Int. J. Human-Comput. Interact. 37(15), 1436–1454 (2021) 101. Wilkowska, W., Otten, S., Maidhof, C., Ziefle, M.: Trust conditions and privacy perceptions in the acceptance of ambient technologies for health-related purposes. Int. J. Human–Comput. Interact. 1–16 (2023) 102. Yusif, S., Soar, J., Hafeez-Baig, A.: Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: a systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 94, 112–116 (2016). https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.07.004 103. Zuboff, S.: The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Profile Books (2019)