Accessibility navigation


Inter-instrument variability of Vaisala CL61 lidar-ceilometer's attenuated backscatter, cloud properties and mixed-layer height

Looschelders, D., Christen, A., Grimmond, S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3166-9415, Kotthaus, S., Fenner, D., Dupont, J.-C., Haefflin, M. and Morrison, W. (2025) Inter-instrument variability of Vaisala CL61 lidar-ceilometer's attenuated backscatter, cloud properties and mixed-layer height. Meteorological Applications. ISSN 1469-8080 (In Press)

[thumbnail of Centaur-10.1002.met.70088-CL61_intercomparison.pdf] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

4MB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Abstract/Summary

Characterising inter-instrument variability of sensors is crucial to assessing uncertainties in observational campaigns, networks, and for data assimilation. Here, we co-locate six high signal-to-noise ratio Vaisala CL61 lidar-ceilometers for a period of ten days to quantify instrument-related differences in several observed variables: profiles of attenuated backscatter, its components (parallel- and crosspolarised backscatter) and the volume linear depolarisation ratio (δ), as well as derived cloud variables and mixed-layer height. Analysing intervals between 5-60 min, median absolute differences between sensors (AD50) and percentiles (e.g. AD75) are used to quantify instrument related uncertainties. For backscatter and δ, we differentiate between conditions with rain, clear sky, and clouds. Here we address instrument precision rather than accuracy, with instrument accuracy assumed. The detected agreement between instruments suggests a distributed measurement network should be capable of providing context for interpretation of spatial differences. If instruments measure accurately, it is possible to resolve spatial differences (e.g. urban-rural) for attenuated backscatter, derived cloud variables and layer heights. However, differences exist and vary with signal-to-noise ratio and atmospheric conditions. The AD50 intersensor results for 15 min intervals for total cloud-cover fraction (excluding clear sky and fully overcast conditions) is 1.9 %, and for cloud base height 7.3 m. Agreement of all cloud variables is better for boundary layer clouds (when first cloud layer < 4 km agl) than for all five cloud layers recorded by the sensor firmware. The 15 min mixed-layer height AD50 is 0 m and the AD75 21.5 m. We show that instrument precipitation flags are in good agreement, but do not link closely with ground-level rainfall observations, hence an alternative algorithm is proposed. We provide quality control recommendations for data processing to improve inter-instrument agreement of cloud variables and mixed-layer height.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Science > School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences > Department of Meteorology
ID Code:123842
Publisher:Royal Meteorological Society

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation