Accessibility navigation

Highlights of model quality assessment in CASP16

Tools
Lists

Fadini, A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5246-9124, Adiyaman, R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8124-5381, Alhaddad, S. N. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1937-0373, Behzadi, B. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8980-0894, Cheng, J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0305-2853, Cui, X. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6015-2449, Edmunds, N. S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7238-6008, Freddolino, L. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5821-4226, Genc, A. G. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7195-9353, Liang, F. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4834-5755, Liu, D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8512-9005, Liu, J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7570-8690, Liu, Q. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8207-2629, McGuffin, L. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4501-4767, Neupane, P. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5283-4951, Peng, C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9735-0278, Shortle, D. R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4903-5865, Sun, M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7123-7788, Wang, H. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1896-9408, Wuyun, Q. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7228-903X et al (2025) Highlights of model quality assessment in CASP16. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. ISSN 0887-3585

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
 Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.
1MB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1002/prot.70035

Abstract/Summary

Model quality assessment (MQA) remains a critical component of structural bioinformatics for both structure predictors and experimentalists seeking to use predictions for downstream applications. In CASP16, the Evaluation of Model Accuracy (EMA) category featured both global and local quality estimation for multimeric assemblies (QMODE1 and QMODE2), as well as a novel QMODE3 challenge—requiring predictors to identify the best five models from thousands generated by MassiveFold. This paper presents detailed results from several leading CASP16 EMA methods, highlighting the strengths and limitations of the approaches.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Interdisciplinary centres and themes > Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research (ICMR)
Life Sciences > School of Biological Sciences > Biomedical Sciences
ID Code:123993
Publisher:Wiley
Download Statistics

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Altmetric
Deposit Details

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation

See also