Accessibility navigation

Highlights of Model Quality Assessment in CASP16

Lists
Tools

Fadini, A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5246-9124, Adiyaman, R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8124-5381, Alhaddad, S. N. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1937-0373, Behzadi, B. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8980-0894, Cheng, J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0305-2853, Cui, X. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6015-2449, Edmunds, N. S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7238-6008, Freddolino, L. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5821-4226, Genc, A. G. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7195-9353, Liang, F. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4834-5755, Liu, D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8512-9005, Liu, J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7570-8690, Liu, Q. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8207-2629, McGuffin, L. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4501-4767, Neupane, P. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5283-4951, Peng, C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9735-0278, Shortle, D. R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4903-5865, Sun, M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7123-7788, Wang, H. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1896-9408, Wuyun, Q. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7228-903X et al (2025) Highlights of Model Quality Assessment in CASP16. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. ISSN 0887-3585 (In Press)

[thumbnail of Proteins - 2025 - Fadini - Highlights of Model Quality Assessment in CASP16.pdf] Text - Published Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
1MB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1002/prot.70035

Abstract/Summary

ABSTRACT Model quality assessment (MQA) remains a critical component of structural bioinformatics for both structure predictors and experimentalists seeking to use predictions for downstream applications. In CASP16, the Evaluation of Model Accuracy (EMA) category featured both global and local quality estimation for multimeric assemblies (QMODE1 and QMODE2), as well as a novel QMODE3 challenge—requiring predictors to identify the best five models from thousands generated by MassiveFold. This paper presents detailed results from several leading CASP16 EMA methods, highlighting the strengths and limitations of the approaches.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Interdisciplinary centres and themes > Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research (ICMR)
Life Sciences > School of Biological Sciences > Biomedical Sciences
ID Code:123993
Publisher:Wiley
Altmetric
Deposit Details

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation

See also