Accessibility navigation


Comparison of the self-assembly and conformations of glucose- and galactose-based glycopyranosides in dilute aqueous solution

Hamley, I. W. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4549-0926, Adak, A., Castelletto, V. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3705-0162 and Seitsonen, J. (2025) Comparison of the self-assembly and conformations of glucose- and galactose-based glycopyranosides in dilute aqueous solution. Langmuir, 41 (37). pp. 25221-25229. ISSN 0743-7463

[thumbnail of Open Access]
Preview
Text (Open Access) - Published Version
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
· Please see our End User Agreement before downloading.

5MB
[thumbnail of GlycolipidsRevisedbNoTrack.docx] Text - Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only

3MB

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

To link to this item DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c02346

Abstract/Summary

A series of glycolipids (glycopyranosides) was prepared by coupling glucosamine or galactosamine (at the C2 position) with myristic (tetradecanoic) or palmitic (hexadecanoic) acid. The conformation and self-assembly were examined in aqueous solutions containing 10% methanol. Circular dichroism and FTIR spectroscopy reveal notable differences in the chiral ordering and conformation comparing analogues with glucose and galactose “headgroups”. A glucose derivative (to palmitic acid) was also prepared with a different (C1-) substitution position of the lipid chain, and this was found to significantly influence chiral ordering and conformation. The self-assembly of the glycolipids was examined using cryogenic-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), which reveals lamellar structures, unilamellar for the glucose-based glycolipids, but multilamellar for the galactose-based analogues. Thus, the conformation and self-assembly of the molecules are very distinct, even though the glucose and galactose homologues have very similar structures, differing only in the orientation of a single hydroxyl group as epimers. These findings were rationalized with information from atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, which showed large differences in hydrogen-bonding density for glucose and galactose derivatives. The number of hydrogen bonds within interdigitated bilayers was much higher for the glucose variants, leading to stabilized unilamellar structures. The unexpectedly large differences in conformation and self-assembly of glycolipids bearing epimer monosaccharides may influence their properties and bioactivities.

Item Type:Article
Refereed:Yes
Divisions:Interdisciplinary centres and themes > Chemical Analysis Facility (CAF)
Life Sciences > School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy > Department of Chemistry
ID Code:124330
Publisher:American Chemical Society

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record

Page navigation