Do multiple credit ratings reduce money left on the table? Evidence from U.S. IPOs

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Goergen, M., Gounopoulos, D. and Koutroumpis, P. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2281-7236 (2021) Do multiple credit ratings reduce money left on the table? Evidence from U.S. IPOs. Journal of Corporate Finance, 67. 101898. ISSN 1872-6313 doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101898

Abstract/Summary

Using credit ratings as an uncertainty-reducing mechanism, we provide evidence of the beneficial impact of multiple credit ratings on reducing IPO underpricing and filing price revision. We find that the acquisition of multiple ratings in the pre-IPO period mitigates uncertainty more than the acquisition of a single rating. Multi-rated firms also have higher probabilities of survival than those with a single rating, whereas credit rating levels matter only for IPOs with more than one rating. The IPOs that are awarded the first rating on the borderline between investment and non-investment grades are more likely to seek an additional rating.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/124814
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101898
Refereed Yes
Divisions No Reading authors. Back catalogue items
Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record