What dialogue after Gaza?

Cheyette, B. (2025) What dialogue after Gaza? Patterns of Prejudice. ISSN 1461-7331 (In Press)

Abstract/Summary

The fifth Gaza War this century is, at the time of writing, two years old with a massive loss of civilian life, including 20,000 children, and the obliteration of most of Gaza’s infrastructure. Specialists in genocide studies have described this war as a ‘genocide’. We can only hope that, by the time this Commentary is published, the cease fire will continue to hold followed by a comprehensive peace plan including Palestinian national rights. The war was precipitated by the Hamas instigated massacre of 1,200 Israelis and foreign nationals, mainly civilian, and the capture of 251 hostages. What dialogue is possible after such mutual bloodletting? Cheyette follows Edward Said, the Palestinian scholar activist, who believed that discussion and dialogue are of the highest moral order in Israel/Palestine and, more realistically today, within the academy where he worked. Is the Israel/Palestine conflict a tragedy, as Said argued, which can only be ended by the political and ethical necessity of discussion and dialogue? Or is it a settler-colonial crime which denigrates discussion and dialogue as a means of normalizing the criminal? How can we effect change as thinking activists and not add to the hostility? Cheyette engages with both the memory of the Holocaust and the ongoing Nakba in a bid to engage with these questions.

Item Type	Article
URI	https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/125568
Refereed	Yes
Divisions	Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Literature and Languages > English Literature
Publisher	Taylor and Francis
Download/View statistics	View download statistics for this item