Do product market threats discipline corporate misconduct?

[thumbnail of ChenSuTianXuZhang_Full_JFQAstyle.pdf]
Text
- Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Chen, J., Su, X., Tian, X., Xu, B. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3512-5834 and Zhang, X. (2025) Do product market threats discipline corporate misconduct? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. ISSN 1756-6916 (In Press)

Abstract/Summary

We examine the efficacy of product market discipline as a deterrent to corporate misconduct. Firms that are subject to greater competitive threats in the product market are less likely to commit violations and pay lower penalties. Stakeholders react negatively to various types of violations, with product market competition amplifying these stakeholder reactions. In response, firms under competitive pressure are more likely to incorporate ESG-related incentives into executive compensation, demonstrate better worker safety practices, invest in green innovation, and use credible auditors. Our findings suggest that product market competition deters misconduct by increasing the expected costs associated with violations.

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/127161
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Finance and Accounting
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record