Systemic risk under the radar: evidence from building societies and challenger banks

[thumbnail of Manuscript]
Other (Manuscript)
- Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.
· Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Skouralis, A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0835-1457 (2026) Systemic risk under the radar: evidence from building societies and challenger banks. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 107. 102267. ISSN 1042-4431 doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2025.102267

Abstract/Summary

This paper provides the first comprehensive quantification of the systemic risk posed by non-listed financial institutions in the UK, focusing on building societies, digital-only challenger banks, and foreign-owned retail banks. Using an indirect estimation approach, systemic risk is measured through balance sheet characteristics, calibrated against listed institutions' SRISK values. The findings reveal that Nationwide ranks among the top ten systemically important institutions, while several other building societies contribute significantly to aggregate systemic risk. In contrast, digital-only challenger banks exhibit low systemic risk due to high equity ratios and limited interconnectedness, despite rapid growth and persistent financial losses. Santander, an foreign-owned retail bank, emerges as the ninth most systemically important institution, with risk levels comparable to systemically-important domestic banks. We conduct extensive robustness checks, including alternative predictors and SRISK specifications, out-of-sample forecasting, and Principal Component Analysis, which confirms the strong co-movement between building societies and the largest UK banks. Finally, we compare SRISK with traditional Z-score metrics to highlight their complementary nature. These findings underscore the need to extend systemic risk frameworks beyond listed entities and support calls to expand the stress testing perimeter to include large non-listed and foreign-owned firms.

Altmetric Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/127758
Identification Number/DOI 10.1016/j.intfin.2025.102267
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > Real Estate and Planning
Publisher Elsevier
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record