Analysing typographic meaning-making in urban spaces: Four illustrative case studies

Anderson, B. 2006. Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso. Bäumler, G. 1985. Farbe-Wort-Interferenztest nach J. R. Stroop. Göttingen: Verlag für Psychologie. Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2022. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. London: Sage. Du Bois, J. W. 2007. ‘The stance triangle’. In Stancetaking in discourse: subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, edited by R. Englebretson, 139–82. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Fernández, N. 2015. StereoTYPES. It ain’t necessarily so. https://itaint-necessarilyso. squarespace.com/articles/2015/11/17/ stereotypes Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic. the social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Arnold. Helfand, J. 2007. ‘Why is this font different from all other fonts?’. Design Observer. http:// designobserver.com/feature/why-is-this-fon t-different-from-all-other-fonts/5597 Järlehed, J., and A. Jaworski. 2015. ‘Typographic landscaping: creativity, ideology, movement’. Social Semiotics 25 (2): 117–25. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2015.1010318 Jaworski, A., and C. Thurlow. 2010. ‘Introducing semiotic landscapes’. In Semiotic landscapes: language, image, space, edited by A. Jaworski, and C. Thurlow, 1–40. London: Continuum. Kersting, V., C. Meyer, P. Strohmeier, and T. Terpoorten. 2009. ‘Die A 40–der Sozialäquator des Ruhrgebiets’. In Atlas der Metropole Ruhr. Vielfalt und Wandel des Ruhrgebiets im Kartenbild, edited by A. Prossek, H. Schneider, H. A. Wessel, B. Wetterau, and D. Wiktorin, 142–5. Köln: Emons. Landry, R., and R. Y. Bourhis. 1997. ‘Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: an empirical study’. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16: 23–49. Leiprecht, R. 2018. ‘Rassismuskritische Ansätze in der Bildungsarbeit’. In Handbuch Interkulturelle Pädagogik, edited by I. Gogolin, V. B. Georgi, M. Krüger-Potratz, D. Lengyel, and U. Sandfuchs, 255–8. Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt. Li, Y. 2023. ‘The chop suey letterform in historical Los Angeles Chinatowns’. Social Semiotics. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2023.2286443 Lippmann, W. 1997 [1922]. Public opinion. New York: Free Press Paperback. Ma, R., W. Wang, F. Zhang, K. Shim, and C. Ratti. 2019. ‘Typeface reveals spatial economical patterns’. Scientific Reports 9: 15946. Meletis, D. 2021. ‘Is your font racist? Metapragmatic online discourses on the use of typographic mimicry and its appropriateness’. Social Semiotics 33 (5): 1046–68. Pinzler, P., and S. Schmitt. 2022. ‘Warum immer mehr Menschen fliehen müssen’. Zeit: Auch das noch? Der freundliche Krisenpodcast, 14 December. Podcast, 56 min. https://www.zeit.de/politik/2022-12/ emigration-flucht-heimat-krisenpodcast Salen, K. 2001. ‘Surrogate multiplicities: typography in the age of invisibility’. Visible Language 35 (2): 132–53. Shaw, P. 2008. ‘Stereotypes: crass ethnic type has a revealing history and, surprisingly, serves a purpose’. Print (August 2008), 109–10. Spitzmüller, J. 2013. Graphische Variation als soziale Praxis. Eine soziolinguistische Theorie skripturaler ‘Sichtbarkeit’. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Stöckl, H. 2005. ‘Typography: body and dress of a text – a signing mode between language and image’. Visual communication 4 (2): 204–14. Sutherland, P. 2015. ‘Writing system mimicry in the linguistic landscape’. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 17: 147–67. Wachendorff, I. 2018. ‘Cultural Stereotypes in Letter Forms in Public Space’. In NERD – New experimental research in design, edited by M. Erlhoff and W. Jonas, 206–33. Basel: Birkhäuser. Wachendorff, I. 2019. Identitätskonstruktionen durch skripturale Variation mehrsprachiger Typografie im urbanen Raum. Duisburg: Universitätsverlag Rhein-Ruhr. Wachendorff, I. 2021. ‘Typographetics of urban spaces: the indication of discourse types and genres through letterforms and their materiality in multilingual urban spaces’, in Grapholinguistics in the 21st century: proceedings of Grapholinguistics in the 21st century, edited by Y. Haralambous, 361–415. Brest: Fluxus Editions. Wachendorff, I. [forthcoming 2025]. Typografische Landschaften – soziale Dimensionen von Schriftzeichen in mehrsprachigen urbanen Räumen am Beispiel der Metropole Ruhr. Essen: DuEPublico. Ziegler, E., H. Eickmans, U. Schmitz, H.-H. Uslucan, D. H. Gehne, S. Kurtenbach, T. Mühlan-Meyer, and I. Wachendorff. 2018. Metropolenzeichen – Atlas zur visuellen Mehrsprachigkeit in der Metropole Ruhr. Duisburg: Universitätsverlag Rhein-Ruhr.