Binding the unbound: challenges of applying international humanitarian law to non-state armed groups

[thumbnail of Final version (SB) accepted on 18 March 2026.pdf]
Text
- Accepted Version
· Restricted to Repository staff only
· The Copyright of this document has not been checked yet. This may affect its availability.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Bagheri, S. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9398-8067 (2026) Binding the unbound: challenges of applying international humanitarian law to non-state armed groups. In: Vidmar, J. (ed.) Hague Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 39. Hague Yearbook of International Law, 39. Brill. (In Press) (ISSN: 0167-6660)

Abstract/Summary

It is now widely recognised that international humanitarian law (IHL) binds all parties to non-international armed conflicts (NIACs); however, non-State armed groups (NSAGs) have frequently violated or minimised their obligations under IHL. Aside from Common Article 1 of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, which imposes a positive obligation on States to respect IHL in all circumstances, Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions urges the parties to NIACs to further endeavour to bring into force, ‘by means of special agreements’, all or part of the other provisions of the Geneva Conventions. This article explores how respect for IHL can be encouraged by engaging with and including NSAGs in humanitarian, legal, and compliance-oriented processes to improve adherence to IHL. It begins by demonstrating the applicability of the Common Article 1 obligation to respect and ensure respect for IHL in NIACs, which requires States to find ways to improve NSAGs’ compliance with IHL. It then examines whether NSAGs have the legal capacity to enter into agreements with States and, if so, how such agreements could be effective and binding under international law. Finally, it aims to highlight the benefits of such agreements as practical tools for promoting respect for IHL by NSAGs, as well as the challenges and difficulties States face in negotiating and implementing these special agreements.

Item Type Book or Report Section
URI https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/id/eprint/129717
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Publisher Brill
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record