Another look at the relative importance of sectors and regions in determining property returnsAndrew, M., Devaney, S. and Lee, S., (2003) Another look at the relative importance of sectors and regions in determining property returns. Working Papers in Real Estate & Planning. 14/03. Working Paper. University of Reading, Reading. pp25.
It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing. Abstract/SummaryThis paper re-examines the relative importance of sector and regional effects in determining property returns. Using the largest property database currently available in the world, we decompose the returns on individual properties into a national effect, common to all properties, and a number of sector and regional factors. However, unlike previous studies, we categorise the individual property data into an ever-increasing number of property-types and regions, from a simple 3-by-3 classification, up to a 10 by 63 sector/region classification. In this way we can test the impact that a finer classification has on the sector and regional effects. We confirm the earlier findings of previous studies that sector-specific effects have a greater influence on property returns than regional effects. We also find that the impact of the sector effect is robust across different classifications of sectors and regions. Nonetheless, the more refined sector and regional partitions uncover some interesting sector and regional differences, which were obscured in previous studies. All of which has important implications for property portfolio construction and analysis.
Download Statistics DownloadsDownloads per month over past year Deposit Details University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record |